Crack DAT PAT? Is it flawed?

[mnotarom]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hello,

So I am reading alot online that Crack DAT PAT is great for the perceptual section. BUT I am also reading that it has flaws in it and sometimes the problems and answers are wrong! Can anyone, who has the program, verify for me that it is worth the money. I really would just like to hear if it is worth it?? AND if they had found any major errors.

Thanks!

 

[Avery07]

Hello,

So I am reading alot online that Crack DAT PAT is great for the perceptual section. BUT I am also reading that it has flaws in it and sometimes the problems and answers are wrong! Can anyone, who has the program, verify for me that it is worth the money. I really would just like to hear if it is worth it?? AND if they had found any major errors.

Thanks!

I have Crack PAT, Math, Reading, & Science -- the best editions of each-- and do not have any issues with the software.

I have previously posted a thread asking about CrackPAT errors however it was just a really difficult problem. CrackPAT is great and is a must have for the PAT section of the DAT. 👍

 

[mnotarom]

Thank you so much! oh and did you get my email address? about sending me the notes? 🙂

 

[Kkae]

I used CDP. I owe my success on this section to it! It was major help. The helpfulness and success rate of it far outweighs the little flaws it has. The flaws I encountered with it were in the cube counting section. Sometimes it was hard to tell whether there was a cube attached beneath another one based on the angle it was placed. Besides, it doesn't get that crazy on the actual test.
I recommend it 99% 👍

 

[mnotarom]

I just bought it! Thanks guys! 🙂