- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 935
does anyone know what specialties in medicine are currently popular now, and which were popular say 10 years ago?
Chris127 said:I dont know if I would consider anesthesiology cush....
passthesashimi said:ortho doesn't sound very cush from what i've read... $$$$$$ maybe, but cush?
Daiphon said:old attending of mine gave me this little tidbit...
"cush lifestyles will erode (EROAD) medicine"
ENT
Rads
Ophtho/Ortho
Anesthesia
Derm
i just thought it was funny... d=) then again, some are starting to add my specialty (EM) to the list, so mayhap it's not so funny.
-t
WhoisJohnGalt said:What's cush about EM???
--naive first year who doesn't understand what could possibly be "cush" in the Emergency Room...
jpro said:Three 12hr shifts a week with absolutely no call. Plenty of money too.
ms. a said:I don't know, ER really isn't that cush, aside from the no call aspect. The 3 12-hour shift thing - it's not like you work 6a -6p for 3 days the have 4 days off. A lot of times you're working overnight, which wipes out the next day and night - family doesn't like that too well. Working weekends is very common. The patient population is generally very frustrating - lots of drug seekers, people abusing the health care system, many difficult patients. Each shift ends with a huge load of stress - again, makes it hard to relax with a family immediately after a shift. Add to that the fact that most ER docs burn out after 10 years, shortly after they finally start making a decent amount of money. Bottom line, you really have to love emergency medicine, because otherwise you're going to go nuts. Oh, and my husband is a former ER doc.
WhoisJohnGalt said:What's cush about EM???
--naive first year who doesn't understand what could possibly be "cush" in the Emergency Room...
bulletproof said:People had been scared off by the whole CRNA thing.
passthesashimi said:what does he do now?
ms. a said:He's an astronaut (but he left EM before that).
shorrin said:i would love to be an astronaut... cool
Anesthesia is not Cush. I was not trying to suggest otherwise. I was simply trying to establish why many are attracted to it as opposed to say surgery or Im ( longer hours, malignant programs, rounding on patients etc.) It is a highly skilled profession and those who do it right make it look easy ( ie. anticipate the problems before they occur ). As to the whole CRNA vs "MDA" ( medical doctor anesthesiologist...many hate this title as they suggest that only physicians are anesthesiologists and everyone else is an anesthetist), please do a search on it in the anesthesia forum, as the arguments are complex and tedious, and are best left to those with more experience than I. Suffice it to say that having followed the arguments for over the past two years I do not feel threatened by CRNAs. There are a number of mid-level practitioners working in medicine ( surg. techs, NPs, AAs, etc.), and yet there surgeons, FPs etc. are still highly sought after. I believe MD oversight is still required, although perhaps you have evidence to the contrary. In any event in many institutions the MDAs run the surgical ICUs, and CRNAs do not have the option of specialising in pain etc. Again, for those interested, I would advise you to go to the anesthesia forum. It is not a best fit for all but for those who have an aversion to treating diabetes, HTN, and hypercholesterolemia all day long...its a God-send.shorrin said:I'm currently on an anesthesia roataion and we probably spent three mornings talking about the erosion of attending's pay d/t medicare policies and CRNA's. This info comes from my attd's, if it's wrong don't yell at me.
CRNA's are certified nurse anesthetists. They are nurses that are allowed to perform the functions of anethesiologists without all the medical school training. They are taught by other CRNA's.
When they first started out CRNA's (depending on state's law) had to be monitored by an attd anesthesiologist. Then legisaltion was changed, as nurses are good organizers, and only an MD had to oversee their actions and sign off, usually a surgeon as happened to be most handy. Now further legislative changes in some states, as I understand it, no longer require MD oversight.
Additionally, CRNA's are not required to disclose thier status to the patient. Not to be MD's are better but.... I've seen a share of PGY2 mishaps.... but I'd sure rather someone with that 5 years of medical training behind them be behind me if I was going under.
Anesthesia, is NOT cush from what I've seen. It's highly dangerous and you need to know what you are doing every minute. paper? that's funny and not true with a good anesthesiologist, even the older ones I've spent time with.
As for reimbursement, as an attd at a teaching hosp overseeing resident's, it's a little known fact that the more surgeries they oversee that overlap the lower the reimbursement gets. eg. 1 surg = 100%, 2 surg 50% each, 3 surg, 33% each.
no specialty in medicine is cush, not if you do it right. 😛