- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 249
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey guys:
I just retook the DAT
8/22 10/11
PAT 19 17
QR 15 16
RC 18 20
Bio 20 24
GC 20 19
OC 21 23
TS 20 22
AA 19 20
Bio: There were 2 slides. 1 of which, i was like WTF? probably got it wrong. Maybe only 3 questions in total that I had never read or knew anything about.
OC: I had the question/reaction that had the extra carbon. I don't get why they can't fix this. The get soo much money from us, they could at least proofread the exam.
QR: much easier... no investment. A couple of trig : Arcsign, and other properties. Know you triangles and how to solve using trig.
GC: Too many calculations. I didn't think I did bad..but I guess so.
PAT: are you kidding me? TFE, Keyholes, Pattern folding were fine, no problem. Angles were way too close, like last time. The cubes were messed up to me. The angle/view they were using made it look like the cubes were sitting differently depending on how you tilted your head.
Good luck to the rest of you who still must take the exam.
I just retook the DAT
8/22 10/11
PAT 19 17
QR 15 16
RC 18 20
Bio 20 24
GC 20 19
OC 21 23
TS 20 22
AA 19 20
Bio: There were 2 slides. 1 of which, i was like WTF? probably got it wrong. Maybe only 3 questions in total that I had never read or knew anything about.
OC: I had the question/reaction that had the extra carbon. I don't get why they can't fix this. The get soo much money from us, they could at least proofread the exam.
QR: much easier... no investment. A couple of trig : Arcsign, and other properties. Know you triangles and how to solve using trig.
GC: Too many calculations. I didn't think I did bad..but I guess so.
PAT: are you kidding me? TFE, Keyholes, Pattern folding were fine, no problem. Angles were way too close, like last time. The cubes were messed up to me. The angle/view they were using made it look like the cubes were sitting differently depending on how you tilted your head.
Good luck to the rest of you who still must take the exam.