Dat 6/23

[ezzy]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Just finished my DAT:

PAT: 19
QR: 16
RC: 20
Bio: 21
GC: 19
OC: 18
TS: 19
AA: 19

I'm a little dissapointed with the QR and RC. I should have done much better on the QR since I'm an engineer. I guess I am too dependent on my calculator.

What do you guys think?

 

[blasterx]

QR is a bit weak. Luckily, it is one of the least important scores that adcoms pay attention to. I see people on predents that have 16 and 17 in that section and have plenty of acceptances. I'm assuming that, as an engineer, you've taken a bunch of math classes and done well in them, right? That should make up for your low QR score. Your other scores are very solid. Well done.

 

[mailman]

Nice Scores. Don't worry about QR. It's not that important.
How did you do so well in Bio? Whats the best way to prepare?

 

[ezzy]

Thanks for the encouragement.

I did okay in my math classes and I have a Master's in engineering, so I do know my math pretty well.

As far as the good bio score, I just finished taking general bio and human physiology, so it was pretty fresh in my mind. I also used the Kaplan blue book and DAT destroyer, but think my classes were the biggest help.

 

[xtractime]

well i'm an engineer also so i know what you mean when you say that you are dependent on your calculator. hahaha. if only i had a TI-89 on the real test. i'd have a program where i could do a query search of the entire destroyer and kaplan material that i had inputted before, so i could get 100% on each section. but i'd be screwed on reading like any other engineer.