Ok, so I just got back from the DAT...
AA: 20
TS: 21
Bio:20
GC: 21
OC: 23
PAT: 21
QR: 17
RC: 17
Bio: Was not bad at all, used DAT Destroyer only... covered pretty much everything whether it was in the actual questions or in the explanations... definitely go through this if you havent
OC/GC: same, not horrible used Destroyer... thought i shouldve done a couple of points better, but im not complaining
PAT: surprisingly harder than the CDP exams... PAT is usually my bread and butter, but there were some very strange key holes and one very strange hold punch in particular... i was ranging from 23-25 on CDP... i also graduated from the studio art program from NYU so i was naturally pretty good at this section, and was shooting for a minimum 25
RC: this section i didnt really know what to expect, but i was shooting realistically for a 19... im very very disappointed with a 17... the passages were longer than expected. i used CDR, did 4 exams (17,18,19 & 20), and Achiever, used 2 (14...eh & 17)...
QR: another disappointment, i was also shooting realistically for a 19... i mustve gone through Math Destroyer 10 times, usually getting 21-25/40 correct... i got a question on p-value which i am not exactly sure what that is, there were some other things that destroyer didnt quite hit but its all become a blur
Overall, it was a bit harder than expected, but well see what happens. Not having to study tonight/for the rest of this week sounds amazing... good luck to everyone taking the exam in the future
AA: 20
TS: 21
Bio:20
GC: 21
OC: 23
PAT: 21
QR: 17
RC: 17
Bio: Was not bad at all, used DAT Destroyer only... covered pretty much everything whether it was in the actual questions or in the explanations... definitely go through this if you havent
OC/GC: same, not horrible used Destroyer... thought i shouldve done a couple of points better, but im not complaining
PAT: surprisingly harder than the CDP exams... PAT is usually my bread and butter, but there were some very strange key holes and one very strange hold punch in particular... i was ranging from 23-25 on CDP... i also graduated from the studio art program from NYU so i was naturally pretty good at this section, and was shooting for a minimum 25
RC: this section i didnt really know what to expect, but i was shooting realistically for a 19... im very very disappointed with a 17... the passages were longer than expected. i used CDR, did 4 exams (17,18,19 & 20), and Achiever, used 2 (14...eh & 17)...
QR: another disappointment, i was also shooting realistically for a 19... i mustve gone through Math Destroyer 10 times, usually getting 21-25/40 correct... i got a question on p-value which i am not exactly sure what that is, there were some other things that destroyer didnt quite hit but its all become a blur
Overall, it was a bit harder than expected, but well see what happens. Not having to study tonight/for the rest of this week sounds amazing... good luck to everyone taking the exam in the future