DAT and MCAT dilemma

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

premedicine555

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
If I've studied for the MCAT, how much more additional months should I study for the DAT?

Additionally, which subjects are similar/different? I heard gchem/ocem is almost identical in terms of studying (keeping in mind one is passage, the other is direct questions).

edit
I looked at Kaplan gchem/ochem... wow, a lot of similar/identical topics. I guess the content may be similar, but the way it's ASKED is differnet?
 
Last edited:
Comparing MCAT bio:https://www.aamc.org/students/download/85566/data/bstopics.pdf and DAT biology, only big difference I see is that, MCAT, is lacking Ecology and plant sections. Besides that, everything else overlaps.
Also DAT has QR (algebra 2 math) and RC (passage based questions) and PAT (how well do you see 3-D stuff and angle differences..)
You don't need to study additional months, maybe 1 month, if you have everything else down for mcat.
 
I haven't taken both, but I've heard that the tests are very different beasts. I'd look over some practice materials and see how you feel. From those I've spoken to who have taken both of the tests, they thought that OC had the same difficulty on both tests but that GC and BIO were harder on the DAT. The PAT is obviously very different, too.

Hey, at least there's no physics on the DAT! 😀

I would honestly just suggest you take a practice test. What is easy to some people may be harder to others. I've seen one person say that they studied a few weeks for the MCAT and nailed it and then had to study a few months to be able to nail the DAT. Just don't dive in too quickly! 🙂
 
If I've studied for the MCAT, how much more additional months should I study for the DAT?

Additionally, which subjects are similar/different? I heard gchem/ocem is almost identical in terms of studying (keeping in mind one is passage, the other is direct questions).

edit
I looked at Kaplan gchem/ochem... wow, a lot of similar/identical topics. I guess the content may be similar, but the way it's ASKED is differnet?

no one in their right mind can answer this... how do we know how extensive your MCAT preparation was to begin with?

as far as similarities go, yes GC and Orgo are the same. Biology is relatively the same (I think DAT covers a few more additional topics) but overall, the 3 sciences are the same.

Now the differences are everything else. DAT doesn't have verbal (DAT's reading is, imo, 100 times easier than MCAT's verbal ~ so thats good). DAT has math, and PAT which, if you don't have a natural eye for it, you will need to prepare (Crack DAT PAT ~ back in my DAT time was the best resource out there)

Assuming you studied hard for the GC / Orgo / Biology during MCAT, you'll only need approx 3 weeks worth of Math and PAT to supplement and take the DAT. This is just my opinion, its not based on anything other than a simple guesstimation
 
I took an official MCAT practice test during the middle of my DAT studying (roommate is premed) and I scored a 30 which is relatively average I'd say. So I can't imagine a ton of extra studying needed but since each test has their own unique sections, you'll have to devote time to mastering them!
 
If I've studied for the MCAT, how much more additional months should I study for the DAT?

Additionally, which subjects are similar/different? I heard gchem/ocem is almost identical in terms of studying (keeping in mind one is passage, the other is direct questions).

edit
I looked at Kaplan gchem/ochem... wow, a lot of similar/identical topics. I guess the content may be similar, but the way it's ASKED is differnet?

I got a 35 on the MCAT and I spent a year studying for the DAT afterwards.
 
I am familiar with both exams at length and here is my take on it -

The MCAT covers organic chemistry, biology, and general chemistry just like the DAT, but the format is VERY different. IMHO the organic chemistry on the MCAT is easier than the DAT. The content of general chemistry is the same, but the testing style is very different. If you enjoy reasoning through problems, then you will like the MCAT more. The majority of the science portion in the MCAT is passage based so if you master that, you should be is great shape. You much also know how to appropriately extrapolate information from the MCAT passages to answer the questions correctly. On the DAT one question is completely independent of the next. Ont he MCAT you have a a few questions on a passage. Therefore, if you do not understand the passage you could be screwed with several questions. The biology on the MCAT is very much genetics, immunology, physiology, and human related. The DAT is not like that. Let me emphasize that again - the DAT is NOT like that. On the DAT you have to know all of that MCAT biology stuff PLUS ecology, classification, and plant biology. Additionally, the MCAT has physics, but DAT does not. Instead the DAT has the PAT section that you must master yourself. It takes time to master that section. I personally would have perfered physics over the PAT section. But I had to suck it up and deal with the PAT section. The verbal section on the MCAT is different that that of the DAT in that the MCAT passages are not science based and often less dense. However, the MCAT has more inference question that search and destroy questions which I would have preferred to have since I read the passage first prior to answering the questions on the DAT. if you head straight to the questions on the MCAT and attempt to do search and destroy and work backwards, you will be screwed. The reading section on the DAT is a crap-shoot. I suggest you pray on test day. Good luck!
 
Top