DAT destroyer vs math destroyer?

[hunterx2]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Question for you guys- when studying for QR did you find the regular DAT destroyer to be sufficient? I'm using the 2008 version with 153 problems, and frankly I feel the questions are a bit too simple and inadequate. Ppl tell me to do destroyer without time constraints because the questions are supposed to be much harder than the real thing. I think I used up slightly more time on the destroyer than I would get on the real DAT, but in the end the only questions I missed were actually errors in the book and not my own fault. (contrast with ochem where I was getting 8-10 wrong per block of 30). Should I move on to math destroyer at this point, or should I just stop studying QR now and move on to something else?

Thanks.

 

[two thirty]

I didn't even look at the QR section of the DAT Destroyer, but the Math Destroyer was great. Some of the questions were very similar to what I encountered on the DAT and it being broken into separate tests with detailed answers was nice.

More practice never hurts, especially if math isn't your strong suit.