- Joined
- Jul 8, 2007
- Messages
- 82
- Reaction score
- 1
PAT-21
RC-20
QR-18
GC-20
OC-23
BIO-19
TS-20 (I think, I don't have my sheet in front me)
AA-20
The test was just like everybody has been saying. Not enough time on QR, conceptual GC, Destroyer was plenty for OC. For BIO I think it would be more beneficial to spend your time going over the material from a book such as Campbells.
TopScore and Achiever are good but don't let them fool you. I did considerably better on the actual test than Achiever or TopScore. Overall I did better on Achiever than TopScore (though I don't list them because I don't have them with me)
Achiever Scores (BIO, GC, OC, QR, PAT)
16/19/17/19/17
15/15/16/18/19
16/18/21/19/NA
Destroyer was my main tool, though I used Kaplan's(went through it once...), Cliff's, and Crack DAT PAT. Crack DAT PAT was probably the most worthwhile tool that I used, despite all of it's errors (there are many). For BIO, I relied on my knowledge from the class the most rather than anything I memorized from Destroyer.
RC-20
QR-18
GC-20
OC-23
BIO-19
TS-20 (I think, I don't have my sheet in front me)
AA-20
The test was just like everybody has been saying. Not enough time on QR, conceptual GC, Destroyer was plenty for OC. For BIO I think it would be more beneficial to spend your time going over the material from a book such as Campbells.
TopScore and Achiever are good but don't let them fool you. I did considerably better on the actual test than Achiever or TopScore. Overall I did better on Achiever than TopScore (though I don't list them because I don't have them with me)
Achiever Scores (BIO, GC, OC, QR, PAT)
16/19/17/19/17
15/15/16/18/19
16/18/21/19/NA
Destroyer was my main tool, though I used Kaplan's(went through it once...), Cliff's, and Crack DAT PAT. Crack DAT PAT was probably the most worthwhile tool that I used, despite all of it's errors (there are many). For BIO, I relied on my knowledge from the class the most rather than anything I memorized from Destroyer.
