DAT DONE!!!!!!! - What I did... Hope it helps

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

jkmuskego

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2011
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Resources Used:
CDP, CDR, Topscore, DAT Destroyer, Math Destroyer, Chad’s Videos, KBB (white version), Cliff, Q Vault

AA/TS/Bio/GC/Orgo/RC/QR/PAT
Score: 22 /23/22/24/27/19/19/21
Percentile: 97/ 97.8/ 98.7/ 97.7/ 95.9/ 52.2/ 91.2/ 87.9

CDP (1->10): 16, 17, 18, 18, 23, 21, 22, 22, 22, 21
CDR (1->10): 18, 17, 17, 18, 18, 21, 19, 17, 19, 20, 16
Topscore AA: 18, 18, 19

Q Vault:

Bio: 20, 19, 20, 19, 22, 18, 20
Organic: 29, 26, 26, 24, 21

Basic Outline of what I did:
I began my studying a week after the semester ended and studied up until July 16th (~ 2 months). The week prior I spent mapping out a study schedule based off of that of dentalWorks. I tried to keep up at the pace he had set, but I was unable to keep up and so everything was extended to about a behind dentalWork’s schedule. I shot for 6-8 hours of studying a day (of actual cognitive work). I began at 8:30 every morning and would studying (w/ breaks) until 11pm. I’m the kind of person that has to take break up my studying. I accumulated just under 400 hours.

Sciences:
- Biology: I read over Cliffs once with light notes. I then moved on to KBB and extensively highlighted key points. I then reread Cliffs and would add notes of Cliff to those I had compiled for KBB. I did go over Destroyer’s Bio once, but that was it.
- General Chemistry: As everyone else on SDN says, “Chad’s the man!” I had never really learned GC, but Chad drew the connections that I needed and his quizzes are great. I went over the GC section of the destroyer twice and a third time only hitting questions I was still struggling with.
- Organic: same as for GC
- Reading Comprehension: I am a terrible reader, but I’ll put in my 2 cents for anyone interested. I had tried the search-and-destroy method, but I would become totally lost and would spend minutes for a single questions. On a free practice Kaplan mini-DAT I received a 10 on the QR. My score didn’t improve tremendously from my practice CDP scores, but again as everyone says it serves as great practice. On my DAT the first 2 passages were easy/ light reads. The third passage… HELL! I ran short on time and had to just choose B for the last 7 questions.
- Quantitative Reasoning: I used the Math Destroyer. I believe the Math destroyer is right on par with the real DAT. I went over the Math Destroyer 3 times. On the second time through I’d time myself. I also utilized several free websites that I have not seen mentioned on SDN but are certainly worth looking over; http://www.purplemath.com/, and http://www.cliffsnotes.com/math-study-guides.html. For myself, I haven’t seen these problems in years. Math destroyer is great, but I feel the explanations are week. These websites provided a great source for me to freshen up
- PAT: I utilized only CDP. I thought it was on par with the real thing.
o Projections: real had more subtle differences, such as the size of a whole
o TFE: Was on par
o Hole Punches: received 1/3 of a fold, but the questions varied from being incredibly easy to equivalent to the hardest ones on CDP
o Angles: varied widely, from incredibly obviously to my choice being a guess
o Cube Counting: easier, without the BS allusions
o Pattern Folding: on par, but for 2/3 I had to mentally figure out how they would actually fold. Sounds awkward, but I’m unsure how else to say this.

Additional:
- During the QR section my computer was freezing up after each question and I probably lost 5-10 minutes simply to that. I thought I absolutely bombed the QR, very thankful for God’s help
- I thought I had done reasonably well on the sciences, but upon going through the 3rd passage of the RC: I was coming to terms that I would need to retake the DAT
- .

Word of Advice
- The DAT is no mystical test and does not require a genius to break a 20 (I am proof). I had simply lived and breathed the DAT material for 2 months.


I feel this is getting to long so I’ll stop, but if anyone has an questions I’d be more than happy to indulge.

PS: sorry for any grammar/ spelling mistakes. And thanks to all the SDNers
 
You are my hero!! I'm glad us ordinary folk have some hope of breaking a 20 even though we may not be the brightest of the bunch (not saying you aren't...I just feel like everyone here on SDN is a super genius).

Congratulations with your scores. Woo!!!
 
Great job, you give me hope! Thanks for the math websites...that's where I'm weakest!


Edit: I need lot's of breaks too! I can go about 2 hours and then I need a few minutes to collect my brain cells.

I'm averaging about 6 hours/day in reality
 
bahaha, thanks tayloreve. I feel the exact same way; I only see outstanding scores on SDN. I think it’s cause all of us that use SDN are slightly obsessive. Lol

Seahawk: I thought the ochem qvault was on par w/ what I had seen on the real DAT. However I did not get a single actual spectra, the most I was asked was regarding the number of 13C peaks. None of the synthesis questions were unusual/ multistep. All the reactions were pretty standard, none of the ridiculous reactions as the Baeyer rxn is the Destroyer. As far as for GC, I did a few questions, but by subject (not the actual tests). My GC test included little/ basic calculations, but was very heavy on concepts, especially utilizing the acid dissociation constant. I did not do more than 10 Q for GC QVault, but I would think it would serve as great practice and if cut on time than just go section by section to what your weak on.

I’m glad the websites helped Msmouth… I didn’t do outstanding w/ the QR, but it certainly helped!

Ali06413: All three of my passages were approximately 13/14 paragraphs. The first two were easy reads and I thought very comparable to the CDR passages, (excluding the fact that many were 22-24 paragraphs). All three were related to the sciences, one on antibiotics and another on osteocytes. The questions were truly questions that one could have utilized S&D for, and I had ~3 tone questions. Personally I cannot utilized the S&D method as I become totally lost to where to even begin looking for the key terms/ idea. I read through the passage and kept brief notes w/ key words as I went.
 
Top