- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
I took a practice DAT at Kaplan.com and the Reading Comprehension murdered me. It was a surprise, because I aced the SAT Reading Comprehension back in the day, and I very nearly aced the GMAT Reading Comprehension section more recently. On the DAT RC, I failed miserably.
Then I went over to Princeton Review. They don't have a practice DAT so I was doing the MCAT Reading Comprehension. This was relatively easy compared to what I had seen at the Kaplan DAT.
So my question is, for anyone who has taken the DAT and the MCAT, is the Reading Comprehension actually more difficult on the DAT? Or is it that Kaplan questions are more challenging than Princeton Review ones?
I'm also sucking at the Perceptual Abilities Test. And I'm not a good at Quantitative stuff (which is not on the MCAT at all). Is it me, is it Kaplan vs. Princeton, or is the DAT significantly harder to crack than the MCAT for a significant amount of people?
Then I went over to Princeton Review. They don't have a practice DAT so I was doing the MCAT Reading Comprehension. This was relatively easy compared to what I had seen at the Kaplan DAT.
So my question is, for anyone who has taken the DAT and the MCAT, is the Reading Comprehension actually more difficult on the DAT? Or is it that Kaplan questions are more challenging than Princeton Review ones?
I'm also sucking at the Perceptual Abilities Test. And I'm not a good at Quantitative stuff (which is not on the MCAT at all). Is it me, is it Kaplan vs. Princeton, or is the DAT significantly harder to crack than the MCAT for a significant amount of people?