Destroyer #86 OCHEM

[gamecock1992]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

I understand why answer c could produce two diastereomers but I don't understand why answer d wouldn't be correct also. Aren't two chiral centers formed which qualifies it for being a possible diastereomer?

 

[hope_to_match]

I understand why answer c could produce two diastereomers but I don't understand why answer d wouldn't be correct also. Aren't two chiral centers formed which qualifies it for being a possible diastereomer?

which year

 

[gamecock1992]

wow sorry that would probably be helpful haha! But it's 2012

 

[hope_to_match]

wow sorry that would probably be helpful haha! But it's 2012

i have 2013 so i cant help you unless you post an image on here

 

[gamecock1992]

wow there is a 2013 version??? How much different do you think it is? Should I buy that instead?