- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Messages
- 304
- Reaction score
- 0
The set of quantum numbers of Na are 3,0,0,1/2 ??? Should be 3,0,1,1/2, right?
searched first but counldn't find it.
searched first but counldn't find it.
The set of quantum numbers of Na are 3,0,0,1/2 ??? Should be 3,0,1,1/2, right?
searched first but counldn't find it.
No, since the L = 0, ml can not be 1. Remember that ml is +/- L.
no, i don't think so. it's +/- L including 0. so, s subshell, where there is one possible value of ml = 0, will contain 1 orbital orientation. The formula for ml is 2L+1. I am like 100% sure but who knows maybe I am completely missing something. Let me know!
S implies that it has a 0 subshell (L). NONONO
If the subshell is 0, how can the orbital number (ml) be 1? That doesnt make any sense.
the subshells corresponding to L=0,1,2,and 3 ARE KNOWN AS the s,p,d, and f respectively!! so we can use this number to find out ml. That doesn't mean S has a 0 subshell!
Comeon! let's then think about P. P=1 -> the possible values of ml are all integer from -L to +L including 0, so -1,0,+1. Again these numbers don't imply that it has -1 subshell? 0 subshell? or +1 subshell? nonono.. It means P has 3(2L+1=3) dumbbell-shaped orbital orientations, which are Px, Py, and Pz.
So, S=0 means we have 1(2L+1=1) sphere-shaped orbital orientation!