I had an attending who was adamant that dilution/hemoconcentration would not have an effect on WBC count. Any takers with substantial evidence either supporting or disclaiming this? Thanks
I had an attending who was adamant that dilution/hemoconcentration would not have an effect on WBC count. Any takers with substantial evidence either supporting or disclaiming this? Thanks
I'm guessing that dilution has less effect on WBCs counts because they are already much less concentrated than RBCs and platelets in the blood. Therefore the difference of adding a couple liters wouldn't be nearly as noticeable with WBCs than, say, with RBCs which are a thousand times more concentrated. Thoughts?
Sorry to your attending, but saying WBCs can't be diluted like any other cell line doesn't pass the smell test. They may rebound faster due to speed of production and potentially sequestered sources like the spleen and LNs.
Demargination is one of those things that everybody talks about but nobody ever sees.
This from your vast clinical experience no doubt...
Don't need too much experience to know that diluting a substance with water lowers the initial substance's concentration. And in my admittedly limited 2 years on the wards, I've routinely seen dilutional effects on all cell lines.
Don't be the one to parrot dogma you've heard without evidence or at the very least a theoretical mechanism. We have enough of that in medicine already.