- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 1
Let me preface this by saying that I have done a search on the DO in Radonc issue, but my questions remain unanswered.
As an older student, it would be beneficial for me to go to a DO school(both financially b/c of a scholarship, and would not have to be separated from my wife and kids b/c of location). However, I really would like to hear from stephew and others on the interview trail about discrimination from DOs. As a PA, I've worked in oncology for a long time, and have worked for PDs who outright reject DOs. Their application doesn't even get a look, simply because they are DOs. Even thought I have research experience and pubs, I wonder if I will even be looked at because I will not have an MD behind my name.
I hear all the time the stories about Ken Wallner, etc. But I think many of the MDs who are attendings and PDs now could very well not have gotten into Radonc programs in today's competitive environment -- so throw in the perceived "disadvantage" of the DO in the minds of the older PDs, and it provides some food for thought. I am wondering what to do about the decision, and would appreciate any and all input.
As an older student, it would be beneficial for me to go to a DO school(both financially b/c of a scholarship, and would not have to be separated from my wife and kids b/c of location). However, I really would like to hear from stephew and others on the interview trail about discrimination from DOs. As a PA, I've worked in oncology for a long time, and have worked for PDs who outright reject DOs. Their application doesn't even get a look, simply because they are DOs. Even thought I have research experience and pubs, I wonder if I will even be looked at because I will not have an MD behind my name.
I hear all the time the stories about Ken Wallner, etc. But I think many of the MDs who are attendings and PDs now could very well not have gotten into Radonc programs in today's competitive environment -- so throw in the perceived "disadvantage" of the DO in the minds of the older PDs, and it provides some food for thought. I am wondering what to do about the decision, and would appreciate any and all input.