Dissociative Disorders Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

JackD

-
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
498
Reaction score
3
I am trying to study for a psychology final and my book just quickly covers dissociative disorders, so i am a little confused about something.

What is the difference between dissociative personality disorder and dissociative identity disorder?
 
I am trying to study for a psychology final and my book just quickly covers dissociative disorders, so i am a little confused about something.

What is the difference between dissociative personality disorder and dissociative identity disorder?

Nothing. They are considered to be the same thing. Actually, I have never heard it coined "dissociative personality disorder", only by dissociative identity disorder (DID). Historically, DID was called multiple personality disorder. It was recently renamed to dissociative identity disorder and lumped into a different group of disorders.

It remains very controversial in the field.
 
Synonymous, though as socialcog wrote, DID is really the accepted term. It is an area of great interest to some, though controversial. My personal opinion is that it exists, but it is much more rare than people make it out to be, and it is not as clear cut as it seems.

[off topic]
I believe an afflicted person has a fractured sense of self, and the 'identities' are splintered parts of the self, and not truly distinct personalities, though they may appear distinct at a certain level. Over-compensation, incomplete/damaged ego development, etc.[/off topic]

-t
 
No difference. Call it DID, its the correct term.

I'm also of the belief that it exists but despite what Hollywood would have you believe, its the sort of disorder you could be in practice for 50 years and still never see a case of.
 
I wonder why the authors of the book made it seem like there was some kind of difference. It was in the section twice, with the different names, and descriptions that seemed to point to them being similar but not quite the same. Oh well, no time to worry about it, back to studying.
 
Maybe two different people wrote those sections. You'd think that'd get caught during the edits, but stuff always slips through.

-t

In the end it didn't matter, since almost nothing in the book was on the test. In fact the test had very little to do with psychology. It was more like an anthropology or sociology test. Questions about what Asian Americans believe in when it comes to respect for their parents and which groups of people are more likely to get married. I'm sure glad i read the entire book this semester, maybe i can use the information someday.
 
No difference. Call it DID, its the correct term.

I'm also of the belief that it exists but despite what Hollywood would have you believe, its the sort of disorder you could be in practice for 50 years and still never see a case of.

bumping this thread. I saw some videos in a class today, from the HBO Undercover America series with the DID patients. I was curious about the thinking on the etiology.

Is serious childhood trauma supposed to be only real cause? Are there other ideas out there?
 
bumping this thread. I saw some videos in a class today, from the HBO Undercover America series with the DID patients. I was curious about the thinking on the etiology.

Is serious childhood trauma supposed to be only real cause? Are there other ideas out there?
Well, other possibilities include it being a vanity diagnosis, as there are not really any case studies of such symptoms prior to last century. To go along with this observation, the vast majority of diagnoses came from a small number of actual practioners, of course after a couple of films (e.g., The Three Faces of Eve, Sybil) made it popular. Then all of a sudden diagnosis rates skyrocketed.

All of that aside, the two main theories seem to be that it is a response to trauma, or that it is has to do with playing a social role in the context of therapy, kind of like with some theories of hypnosis.

I think it exists, but is very rare, and probably can be the result of both prevailing theories. I lean towards the former, but the latter is probably most applicable these days.

Dissociative symptoms are one of those areas that can be difficult to comprehend. There always will be some skepticism, and rightfully so. I recall plenty of "my psychopathology is bigger than yours" observations from an adolescent inpatient unit I worked on years ago. These days, many people diagnose themselves first and then show up presenting with symptoms straight from Web MD (or Wikipedia). But, I think there truly are some cases out there that have less to do with being impressionable or Axis II.
 
Top