Unpopular opinion:
You bill DME, therefore your % is calculated off of net profit from the device, not merely what the device generates. ....
It's ultimately up to any practice to do what they like. They can be as greedy or fair with associates (or other staff) as they choose. It applies to all employees and all services.... even OTC.
We all know a CAM boot can be bought ($40), stocked ($2), MA labor to fit ($3), billed ($10), probably even a replace for defective air bladder at post op visit 4 ($40)... still not even at 50% of what it'll reimburse. I would say the replace/refund on those is maybe 5%, but we'll make the overhead/cost/expense semantics as big as possible. So, if it's like anything else with overhead ~50%, why not pay the associate their contracted % of gross collect? I don't get it. Never will. It's greed... it's podiatry... it's "tradition"? Many a PP owner or mgr will make sure to grab that extra $15 or $20 from an associate with huge debt.
🙂
Are we going to reimburse them for their % on E&M codes
minus the cost of scalpel blades and prorated sharpening nippers and met pad and prorated Dremel battery usage and autoclave eventual replace? Wound debride code net the cost of bandaging and silvadene dollop? Of course not.
I think these net collect on certain common stuff (DME, wraps, injects) are the signs of a miserly and antiquated owner associate contract. They are not a deal-breaker for interview associates, but they're a red flag... associate should absolutely nix any partnership or buyout potential stated or perceived with a bean counter owner like that. Those clauses should be called out and discarded if possible (probably doable in single associate office, unlikely in med/large group, mill, supergroup, etc). The owners should be focused on growing and flourishing, not nickel and diming their own associate. And sure, they could always just lie about gross collections anyways (and typically do), but trying fancy accounting right up front to grind down the collections that the associate gets % from is such classic TFP stuff. Perhaps it's to create the illusion of a higher % collections, perhaps it was once done to the owner, or who knows? It will continue to happen because DPMs let it happen, especially in saturated metros. You really don't see it in MD contracts, though. If you told an ortho or ER they'd get 40% of each ankle brace $90 reimburse
minus $20 cost, so 40% of $50 - or that you downgraded their Rvu 25% for DME overhead... they'd promptly and definitely tell you to ______ ______.
...Comparing skin sub craziness net/gross to predictable and common DME is apples to oranges... not even really worth addressing. That obviously needs some adjust, but again, owner can rip them off or make it pretty fair. The bigger question on those is if it's ethical to use stuff with no good EBM just because it pays well.
👍