Do any of you in private practice actually do pro bono work?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Members don't see this ad :)
Not there yet, but what's the upside for doing pro bono in private practice exactly? I could see using it as a marketing tool.
 
I do some pro bono work, mostly on the intervention side of things, not assessment. Currently I have a reduce rate (long-term) patient and a pro bono slot that I fill, as needed.

I learned early on that any pro bono work I do will not involve a 3rd party anything. Medicaid is a nightmare, and so are city/county/state funded groups.
 
Freud’sMommy said:
Not there yet, but what's the upside for doing pro bono in private practice exactly? I could see using it as a marketing tool.
Click to expand...

Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Psychologists establish relationships of trust with those with whom they work. They are aware of their professional and scientific responsibilities to society and to the specific communities in which they work. Psychologists uphold professional standards of conduct, clarify their professional roles and obligations, accept appropriate responsibility for their behavior, and seek to manage conflicts of interest that could lead to exploitation or harm. Psychologists consult with, refer to, or cooperate with other professionals and institutions to the extent needed to serve the best interests of those with whom they work. They are concerned about the ethical compliance of their colleagues' scientific and professional conduct. Psychologists strive to contribute a portion of their professional time for little or no compensation or personal advantage.
 
Freud’sMommy said:
Not there yet, but what's the upside for doing pro bono in private practice exactly? I could see using it as a marketing tool.
Click to expand...
You REALLY don't want to advertise that you do pro bono work. If you do, people will categorize you as the "free care" option. Then they send you all the BS stuff, and send the paying work to someone else.

Most insurance contracts will also limit your ability to do pro bono work.

It is also likely that most psychologists cannot handle the intricacies of indigent people in outpatient settings. Someone is complaining of sleep issues because roaches are biting them in their sleep? Patient has been standing in your parking lot for 4 hrs, and you have to leave? Patient is stressed because they are out of food and money? You don't have the community resources to handle that.

Do charity quietly.
 
R. Matey said:
Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Psychologists establish relationships of trust with those with whom they work. They are aware of their professional and scientific responsibilities to society and to the specific communities in which they work. Psychologists uphold professional standards of conduct, clarify their professional roles and obligations, accept appropriate responsibility for their behavior, and seek to manage conflicts of interest that could lead to exploitation or harm. Psychologists consult with, refer to, or cooperate with other professionals and institutions to the extent needed to serve the best interests of those with whom they work. They are concerned about the ethical compliance of their colleagues' scientific and professional conduct. Psychologists strive to contribute a portion of their professional time for little or no compensation or personal advantage.
Click to expand...
Remember that the last sentence there includes things like volunteering (including board membership) for local, regional, national professional organizations, local agency professional advisory boards, community events (e.g. autism walks), giving a free talk a senior or other community center, etc.

If you do choose to provide pro bono treatment/assessment, you need to do so ethically. Even though no money is exchanged, you have the same ethical and clinical obligations to the non paying client. Don't skip the contract that states exactly what you will provide, when you'll do it, and what the client responsibilities are, including the fee you will charge (i.e. 0$). Be very sure not to deprioritize the needs of the pro bono client to prioritize the needs of a paying one- you're state psychology disciplinary board will not accept "yeah but it was a pro bono case" as a defense of any clinical or professional malfeasance on your part.

I can't emphasize enough what @PsyDr said above about checking any insurance contracts you may have to make sure it's allowed. You don't want to set your current going rate at $0.00. I'd also avoid doing pro bono for someone who has insurance that you are paneled with. Apart from not making any sense, you don't want to be seen as party to an attempt to avoid a deductible or copay and get the clientbin trouble. Finally, if you work for anyone other than yourself, make sure they are OK with it.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
R. Matey said:
Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Psychologists establish relationships of trust with those with whom they work. They are aware of their professional and scientific responsibilities to society and to the specific communities in which they work. Psychologists uphold professional standards of conduct, clarify their professional roles and obligations, accept appropriate responsibility for their behavior, and seek to manage conflicts of interest that could lead to exploitation or harm. Psychologists consult with, refer to, or cooperate with other professionals and institutions to the extent needed to serve the best interests of those with whom they work. They are concerned about the ethical compliance of their colleagues' scientific and professional conduct. Psychologists strive to contribute a portion of their professional time for little or no compensation or personal advantage.
Click to expand...

Funny how one word can invalidate the rest of the sentence.
 
super.ego said:
Yes. Pro bono slots, sliding rate slots, and still earn very well.
Click to expand...
Similar, except the pro bono and sliding scale is only for the people working for me that are still getting training and supervised experience. I did some pro bono work when I was starting out but I’m pretty busy with running a business while maintaining revenue.
 
Young Grasshoppa said:
Honest fella
Click to expand...
I worked for free all through grad school - then got exploited during internship so....I paid my dues. I am very fiscally-focused. I run my practice just like any other business, whether they be selling clothes, food, etc. Each time slot has a certain value for me, so I make decisions based on multiple factors with $$ and time being my top two factors. Like Kevin and Mark say on Shark Tank "I don't get out of bed for X amount."
 
smalltownpsych said:
Similar, except the pro bono and sliding scale is only for the people working for me that are still getting training and supervised experience. I did some pro bono work when I was starting out but I’m pretty busy with running a business while maintaining revenue.
Click to expand...

Well if you're the one providing the supervision, then you are doing pro bono work in a way. I imagine the profit margins on those training isn't nearly as high as those who can work independently.
 
I have one pro bono slot (I call it a "scholarship" instead of "pro bono") open every 3 months; that patient has the option to "graduate" to sliding scale afterwards. It is time limited and not session limited, so if they miss 4 weeks of sessions they don't get to extend.
 
chicandtoughness said:
I have one pro bono slot (I call it a "scholarship" instead of "pro bono") open every 3 months; that patient has the option to "graduate" to sliding scale afterwards. It is time limited and not session limited, so if they miss 4 weeks of sessions they don't get to extend.
Click to expand...
Very creative!
 
msc545 said:
Any Medicaid work I do is pro bono, since I don't even bother with the billing - simply too much hassle for too little pay.
Click to expand...
This. Occasionally I have clients who switch into medicaid, and I typically see them for free for a while until they can get back on the exchange. Medicaid is nigh impossible for a solo practitioner. It's so much worse than Medicare, so it doesn't have to be this way, but it is.
 
PsySeeker said:
This. Occasionally I have clients who switch into medicaid, and I typically see them for free for a while until they can get back on the exchange. Medicaid is nigh impossible for a solo practitioner. It's so much worse than Medicare, so it doesn't have to be this way, but it is.
Click to expand...

The public feels bad for "old people" and wants them to have things. No one feels bad for "poor people". I don't imagine it will change any time soon. Bootstraps and all that.
 
Sanman said:
The public feels bad for "old people" and wants them to have things. No one feels bad for "poor people". I don't imagine it will change any time soon. Bootstraps and all that.
Click to expand...

Issues are twofold here between reimbursement and bureaucracy. Reimbursement will be highly dependent on state. But the paperwork burden is fairly universal here. Medicare is just easier all around to deal with than most payors. Medicaid can pay similarly in some states, but all of the admin burden eats into your time/reimbursement ratio there.
 
WisNeuro said:
Issues are twofold here between reimbursement and bureaucracy. Reimbursement will be highly dependent on state. But the paperwork burden is fairly universal here. Medicare is just easier all around to deal with than most payors. Medicaid can pay similarly in some states, but all of the admin burden eats into your time/reimbursement ratio there.
Click to expand...

None of the states I have been in reimburse anywhere close to even Medicare. The paperwork is worse and the billing more restrictive, especially for treatment reimbursement. I know that @ClinicalABA does alright on the child side.

IMO, the reason for the lack of federal coverage is the perception difference even though the patients can often be similar.
 
Sanman said:
None of the states I have been in reimburse anywhere close to even Medicare. The paperwork is worse and the billing more restrictive, especially for treatment reimbursement. I know that @ClinicalABA does alright on the child side.
Click to expand...
Rates are not great for medicaid testing with children, relative to some commercial insurers and- especially- what you could charge private pay. I make up for that in volume, and am also a "value added" service to my parent agency (which is primarily an ABA provider). My salary is augmented by teaching in an affiliated graduate program. I aim to (and usually succeed) in covering my annual salary plus 25% in billable services, but that involves a lot of testing. Across the entire group of psychologists, there are some years where we barely break even (or don't) and the testing services are subsidized by the other services in the agency (which, granted, could not operate without children diagnosed with ASD, and in some areas of the state we are the only ones doing those diagnostic evals). It would be financially difficult to operate a stand alone toddler testing clinic that primarily saw medicaid clients.
 
WisNeuro said:
Issues are twofold here between reimbursement and bureaucracy. Reimbursement will be highly dependent on state. But the paperwork burden is fairly universal here. Medicare is just easier all around to deal with than most payors. Medicaid can pay similarly in some states, but all of the admin burden eats into your time/reimbursement ratio there.
Click to expand...
Medicaid (Called MediCal here in CA) is just laughable relative to going rates. Even worse, the paperwork burden is terrible and I am unwilling to do it myself or to hire anyone to do it for me given the very low reimbursement rate for Psychologists. Lastly, if you happen to get caught up in one of their draconian audits, that alone will make you wish you had never billed them.

The MediCal system is California is designed to accomplish two goals:

1. To discourage patients from trying to use it, and this works fairly well when they discover that their are relatively few providers that will accept it.

2. To discourage providers from accepting it for all of the reasons I have previously mentioned. The system is 95% unusable, and if you do try to use it you will be discouraged immediately by the number of ridiculous hoops you have to jump through just to even get credentialed.
 
msc545 said:
Medicaid (Called MediCal here in CA) is just laughable relative to going rates. Even worse, the paperwork burden is terrible and I am unwilling to do it myself or to hire anyone to do it for me given the very low reimbursement rate for Psychologists. Lastly, if you happen to get caught up in one of their draconian audits, that alone will make you wish you had never billed them.

The MediCal system is California is designed to accomplish two goals:

1. To discourage patients from trying to use it, and this works fairly well when they discover that their are relatively few providers that will accept it.

2. To discourage providers from accepting it for all of the reasons I have previously mentioned. The system is 95% unusable, and if you do try to use it you will be discouraged immediately by the number of ridiculous hoops you have to jump through just to even get credentialed.
Click to expand...
I had MediCal as a child.

It was almost impossible for my mom to find me an asthma specialist when I started to develop major problems but eventually she found one. But it was basically through her begging and their kindness that I was able to get seen.

It was a very nice office in a very well to do part of CA (it smelled rich lol) and I wouldn't be surprised if I was a pro bono patient & they never even billed MediCal.
 
When it costs more to bill MediCal than the amount you get reimbursed, most people stop accepting MediCal patients and stop trying to bill it.
 
msc545 said:
When it costs more to bill MediCal than the amount you get reimbursed, most people stop accepting MediCal patients and stop trying to bill it.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, as has been said, this is the case with Medicaid in many states. It's often easier (in terms of time, money, and sanity) just to see the cases pro bono.
 
AcronymAllergy said:
Unfortunately, as has been said, this is the case with Medicaid in many states. It's often easier (in terms of time, money, and sanity) just to see the cases pro bono.
Click to expand...
Yes, exactly. It is not an accident that these systems are so difficult and costly for providers to use. They were designed that way because the entities that supposedly fund them want to spend as little money as possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Dos and Don'ts of neuropsychology private practice
Replies
37
Views
3K
deleted1205176
D
neurotic_cow
Is it worth it financially to start or join neuropsych private practice if I don't want to do forensic/legal work?
Replies
3
Views
764
AcronymAllergy
AcronymAllergy
F
Post Doc vs Unlicensed Psychologist in Private Practice
Replies
14
Views
2K
FruitLover2.1
F
BFA222
Maryland Private Practice
Replies
0
Views
518
BFA222
BFA222
M
  • Question Question
Private Practice vs Public Sector in Neuropsychology
Replies
8
Views
2K
summerbabe
summerbabe
Top