- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 7
Do medical school boards look at what you have posted on the SDN forums? I'm not sure if this is another form of social media, so can it be held against you?
Remember, remember the rescindment of November.
Link?
Link?
I'm glad this worked out so well for you but I wouldn't encourage others who are reading this to do that. You never know what the adcom members will think of SDN/online forums. It's not worth the risk when anonymity is so easy here. I certainly understand the sentiment though.To those that know me, I have ZERO anonymity on here (Freezer isn't a nickname). I always figured that if I can't put my name behind a post, then don't post. All in all, I feel this philosophy served me well when applying. My top choice school was Virginia Tech Carilion and I posted regularly on their forums. Being a new school, a lot of us were sorting the good information from the bad, dealing with a lot of ridiculous criticism (seriously, we had a guy try to steer us away from the school because it was built on a flood plain), and discussing many unknowns about the developing school. All in all, when I arrived on interview day, almost the entire staff knew who I was and had very positive responses my posts on SDN. If your 2 tasks to getting into medical school is to perform academically and be memorable, I have to admit, SDN didn't hurt in the later.
To those that know me, I have ZERO anonymity on here (Freezer isn't a nickname). I always figured that if I can't put my name behind a post, then don't post. All in all, I feel this philosophy served me well when applying. My top choice school was Virginia Tech Carilion and I posted regularly on their forums. Being a new school, a lot of us were sorting the good information from the bad, dealing with a lot of ridiculous criticism (seriously, we had a guy try to steer us away from the school because it was built on a flood plain), and discussing many unknowns about the developing school. All in all, when I arrived on interview day, almost the entire staff knew who I was and had very positive responses my posts on SDN. If your 2 tasks to getting into medical school is to perform academically and be memorable, I have to admit, SDN didn't hurt in the later.
Yeah, dude. To any new members who have their real photo and real name here, I advise you to make a new account.Do medical school boards look at what you have posted on the SDN forums? I'm not sure if this is another form of social media, so can it be held against you?
Actually has the potential to be a useful admissions strategy - particularly if the school in question is new or "low tier" or otherwise not 'universally loved' on SDN. Kind of hope the idea doesn't catch on though...
But as to your core point -- I agree completely.
"I always figured that if I can't put my name behind a post, then don't post."
Do medical school boards look at what you have posted on the SDN forums? I'm not sure if this is another form of social media, so can it be held against you?
I like you.Make every effort to not be racist in general. You know, in life.
*cough* cache *cough*It's probably google-able. If you can't google it, it was probably taken down.
I've heard two medical school deans directly reference specific threads on SDN.
ouch that's unbelievably harsh. Racism is bad, but holding people accountable for something online that may or may not even be their own beliefs or that they may changed their opinion about is really unnecessarily harsh. This reminds me of how the CEO of mozilla had to resign because it was found out he voted for prop 8 years ago (or at least that's the rumor). Lots of people post stupid things online and they can change their beliefs or might not be serious in the first place. If a person was advocating violence or crimes that's obviously different, but I think this other stuff is taken too seriously.
Every action has consequences, but I think taking away an admission that took years of work, genuine passion, and dedication is unnecessarily harsh. I also fail to see how it serves any justice as all it selects for is for people that keep their maladaptive beliefs to themselves (it's not like purging students who post dumb stuff purges the system of individuals with maladaptive beliefs) and where do you draw the line over what evidence is actually meaningful enough to rescind admission?. Will people get their admissions repealed for trash talking in call of duty 5 years ago? It's also pretty easy for people to abuse the fact that adcoms do this and use it as a way to ruin others. I'm not defending people's bad actions, but at the same time there's more to this than just a person posting bad stuff => he shouldn't be at our school.
Actually, if you can't behave in an adult manner when you are in public, whether online or in person, schools absolutely should drop you. Being online is not some magic arena where nothing you say or do really counts. Why would a school take someone who makes overtly racist comments, or behaves in any other blatantly inappropriate manner, over someone who DOESN'T behave in that manner? Schools take this kind of thing seriously because this ISN'T a group of 12 year olds playing call of duty: schools are selecting individuals who in a few short years will be directly responsible for the lives of others. Being a decent human being, even when you don't think anyone is watching, is important for everyone, and especially so for a physician....ouch that's unbelievably harsh. Racism is bad, but holding people accountable for something online that may or may not even be their own beliefs or that they may changed their opinion about is really unnecessarily harsh. This reminds me of how the CEO of mozilla had to resign because it was found out he voted for prop 8 years ago (or at least that's the rumor). Lots of people post stupid things online and they can change their beliefs or might not be serious in the first place. If a person was advocating violence or crimes that's obviously different, but I think this other stuff is taken too seriously.
Every action has consequences, but I think taking away an admission that took years of work, genuine passion, and dedication is unnecessarily harsh. I also fail to see how it serves any justice as all it selects for is for people that keep their maladaptive beliefs to themselves (it's not like purging students who post dumb stuff purges the system of individuals with maladaptive beliefs) and where do you draw the line over what evidence is actually meaningful enough to rescind admission?. Will people get their admissions repealed for trash talking in call of duty 5 years ago? It's also pretty easy for people to abuse the fact that adcoms do this and use it as a way to ruin others. I'm not defending people's bad actions, but at the same time there's more to this than just a person posting bad stuff => he shouldn't be at our school.
Actually, if you can't behave in an adult manner when you are in public, whether online or in person, schools absolutely should drop you. Being online is not some magic arena where nothing you say or do really counts. Why would a school take someone who makes overtly racist comments, or behaves in any other blatantly inappropriate manner, over someone who DOESN'T behave in that manner? Schools take this kind of thing seriously because this ISN'T a group of 12 year olds playing call of duty: schools are selecting individuals who in a few short years will be directly responsible for the lives of others. Being a decent human being, even when you don't think anyone is watching, is important for everyone, and especially so for a physician....
Yes, but how immature, how undesirable, how noticeable, how public?It's not like this sort of behavior is restricted to one sort of individual or is enough to characterize them as juvenile. if you observed every individual in every setting you would find each one guilty of some sort of undesirable behavior that would revoke their med school admissions at some point in their life. Where do you draw the line?
We aren't talking about someone making benign joking comments on facebook, we are talking about blatant racism. Either that individual actually believes what they stated, in which case the shouldn't be in medical school, or they really are immature/clueless/whatever enough to say that even though they don't believe it, in which case they shouldn't be in medical school. People need to start realizing that actions have consequences; this is medical school we are talking about, not high school or even college.It's not like this sort of behavior is restricted to one sort of individual or is enough to characterize them as juvenile. if you observed every individual in every setting you would find each one guilty of some sort of undesirable behavior that would revoke their med school admissions at some point in their life. Where do you draw the line? Broad sweeping generalizing about how one's online behavior may appear to superficially fill in the gaps in the adcom's thought processes but it really says very little about they way one will behave in a clinical setting without resorting to slippery slope arguments.
Yes, but how immature, how undesirable, how noticeable, how public?
We aren't talking about someone making benign joking comments on facebook, we are talking about blatant racism. Either that individual actually believes what they stated, in which case the shouldn't be in medical school, or they really are immature/clueless/whatever enough to say that even though they don't believe it, in which case they shouldn't be in medical school. People need to start realizing that actions have consequences; this is medical school we are talking about, not high school or even college.
Okay, for the purposes of discussion if some was a KKK member and posted racist tirades online that'd totally be a good reason to expel them, but as move farther away from black and white cases, especially when we dont have a context it becomes more subjective and potentially less and less fair. Employers browse people's facebooks and if they see a picture of the person holding a beer that can be grounds for denial of employment. i'm just wondering where the line is drawn if anything you say can be found and used against you.
Yeah, dude. To any new members who have their real photo and real name here, I advise you to make a new account.
It's not like this sort of behavior is restricted to one sort of individual or is enough to characterize them as juvenile. if you observed every individual in every setting you would find each one guilty of some sort of undesirable behavior that would revoke their med school admissions at some point in their life. Where do you draw the line? Broad sweeping generalizing about how one's online behavior may appear to superficially fill in the gaps in the adcom's thought processes but it really says very little about they way one will behave in a clinical setting without resorting to slippery slope arguments.
Do medical school boards look at what you have posted on the SDN forums? I'm not sure if this is another form of social media, so can it be held against you?
But can't SDN be used in your favor for admissions? What if they see how hard you're trying to get into medical school, shouldn't you declare who you are then?
But can't SDN be used in your favor for admissions? What if they see how hard you're trying to get into medical school, shouldn't you declare who you are then?
But can't SDN be used in your favor for admissions? What if they see how hard you're trying to get into medical school, shouldn't you declare who you are then?
But, BuffOP I thought that was a picture of you 😉
Will people get their admissions repealed for trash talking in call of duty 5 years ago?
This reminds me of how the CEO of mozilla had to resign because it was found out he voted for prop 8 years ago (or at least that's the rumor).
Wow... that should be illegal.
free market capitalism!I agree, that whole incident left a bad taste in my mouth. That happened YEARS AGO and they dug it up a week ago, it also takes time for social beliefs to change throughout society (not every member of society is going to accept or understand it as fair right away), and he could have easily changed his beliefs in that time. It also says nothing about his qualifications to run a job. If he was in westburo baptist church or something then it'd be fair, but he didn't even say anything against people of alternate sexual persuasions in the first place.
I actually agree......assuming you don't also want to force people to bake cakes 😉free market capitalism!
the free hand of economics said he was not fit to lead, who are you to judge the market's beliefs