Just wondering?
I don't think it matters much. I've seen it both ways. More people put it as work experience.
Please note that this refers only to IMG's. US grads should not list away rotations and the like as "work experiences".
If that's what it says, then list them at work experiences.
US grads shouldn't list away rotations at all -- neither as work nor volunteer experiences. They will be listed on your transcript, and included in your dean's letter, and you'll probably have an LOR. There's no need to list it separately.
What about the international student?If that's what it says, then list them at work experiences.
US grads shouldn't list away rotations at all -- neither as work nor volunteer experiences. They will be listed on your transcript, and included in your dean's letter, and you'll probably have an LOR. There's no need to list it separately.
What about the international student?
List cores only as work experience? Or all rotations done so far (pretty much electives), as work experience?
Since you got paid, it's definitely a work experience. Sounds crazy, though. Why would anyone pay you to observe? (Rhetorical question)US allopathic student here,
do we list paid observerships in work experience? Did 2 observerships (not aways, here at my home program in 2 different departments) between M1 and M2 year, basically a preview of clinical years but got paid to be a medical student.
Thanks in advance.
Since you got paid, it's definitely a work experience. Sounds crazy, though. Why would anyone pay you to observe? (Rhetorical question)
Your guess is as good as mine. I suppose it was generate interest in different departments. I feel guilty for entering it into ERAS. Don't even know how to really describe it