Do we expect to see these kinds of calorimetry problems on the DAT?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

rak173

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
222
Reaction score
46
A compound is burned in a bomb calorimeter that contains 3.00 L of water. If the combustion of 0.285 moles of this compound causes the temp. of water to rise 36.0 degrees Celsius, what is the molar heat of combustion of the compound?

The formula you have to use is ΔH =mCΔT which is basically same as Q = mCΔT. How does this problem differ from finding heat transferred from a material (Q)? Do we expect to see these kind of problems on the DAT? I never saw this kind of question anywhere yet.
 
A compound is burned in a bomb calorimeter that contains 3.00 L of water. If the combustion of 0.285 moles of this compound causes the temp. of water to rise 36.0 degrees Celsius, what is the molar heat of combustion of the compound?

The formula you have to use is ΔH =mCΔT which is basically same as Q = mCΔT. How does this problem differ from finding heat transferred from a material (Q)? Do we expect to see these kind of problems on the DAT? I never saw this kind of question anywhere yet.

Just curious- what's the answer to this question?
 
Yes. It's a thermodynamics-related question, so there's a chance you may see one. Watch Chad's Videos to get more practice.

I am asking this after watching Chad's video and doing his quizzes. These problems are done little differently than those "Calculate Heat transferred" problems.
 
Was wondering how you solved for this?

Use ΔH =mCΔT to find out ΔH for water: ΔH =mCΔT = (3000 g)(4.184)(36) 452 kJ

So now we have 452 kJ for every 0.285 moles of the compound and so for every 1 mol we will have 452/0.285 1590 kJ and this is the answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m91
Top