No they don't. This is a common misconception perpetuated by pre-meds who have no idea what medical schooling, training, or practice is really about (don't feel bad, we have all been there)
Hence my strong response on the subject. So even though you called me out for some reason for my objection to your use of DO... apparently I hit the nail on the head with why you posted it
👍
Because you don't know what you are talking about

The approach is the same. OMT is the only difference in trianing, and it isnt a perspective, it is a therapy. That is like saying your cardiologist has a different outlook on medicine as compared to your nephrologist because some of the drugs they use are different.
Yes, in the same way that I believe that 2+2=4. This isn't really a matter of opinion. The "difference" is a romanticized urban legend spread among pre-meds and patients who like "holistic" (read: alternative) approaches and are disenfranchised with modern medicine. The great irony is that they fall head over heels for confirmation bias when they meet a DO they like. Placebo works on many levels, not just treatment modalities.
The OP certainly can prefer DO. But to do so for reasons that dont exist (i.e. "holistic" approaches or this phantom different outlook) would be foolish. If you like DO for what it offers go for it. If you prefer holistic medicine and go DO the most holistic part of your training will be you, not the training
👍
Seriously?
😕
I thought I knew what medicine was when I was pre-med as well. Since becoming a medical student the only thing about medicine that I have learned is that I don't know crap. Luckily I was graced with the ability to apply this knowledge onto my past and draw comparisons to others who are in the position I was in previously
😉