Does everyone else have this on their AADSAS?

[smthngintheway]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hey everyone.

Since reading other people's posts on how AADSAS screwed up their GPAs, I was wondering if it's normal to have no DAT scores listed in your "official scores" section? I always thought it weird that something called "official scores" would have no scores listed...

So is this normal or is it just me? The page says "Please be aware that AADSAS is in the process of receiving and processing DAT scores from the ADA. If AADSAS has received your DAT score from the ADA, you may see it posted to your application as early as June 23, 2011. AADSAS will continue to receive scores after this date and post them to applications as they are received. Please be patient while these scores are posted."

Note: I took my DAT in August.

 

[jeffity]

All you get is Date Taken and Date Received.

You just trust your unofficial report is what your official scores are. Discrepancies are rare.

 

[AlbinoPolarBear]

All you get is Date Taken and Date Received.

You just trust your unofficial report is what your official scores are. Discrepancies are rare.

This is correct.

Also, if you want to make sure that the uploaded scores are correct, you can call AADSAS and ask them to verify your scores. They are really nice about it.

 

[jeffity]

This is correct.

Also, if you want to make sure that the uploaded scores are correct, you can call AADSAS and ask them to verify your scores. They are really nice about it.

That's nice to know. I never knew for sure until I saw my scores on my application across the interview table last week. This particular interviewer placed emphasis on PAT/RC/QR. Weird combo.

 

[MrAvicii]

That's nice to know. I never knew for sure until I saw my scores on my application across the interview table last week. This particular interviewer placed emphasis on PAT/RC/QR. Weird combo.

RC makes sense, QR is kind of important as well, but PAT is probably a poor indicator. The DAT study found RC and QR to be highly correlated to pre-clinical success.

 

[smthngintheway]

Good to know guys, thanks 🙂