- Joined
- Nov 7, 2014
- Messages
- 167
- Reaction score
- 279
Seems like a lot of money for one of the few meds FDA approved for tardive dyskinesia.
Who ends up footing the bill?
Who ends up footing the bill?
What other potentially indicated meds? There's nothing else with what I would call robust evidence.Are you all finding it more effective than the myriad other potentially indicated medications for TD? I don't treat a population with high TD prevalence so little experience with most meds for it in general.
Sure, the aggregate difference isn't huge. But it includes plenty of people with meaningful individual change. The raters in the studies were rigorously blinded which is the most important thing.Went to a pharmacy dinner for Ingrezza once - mostly because I wanted to go to the restaurant the dinner was hosted at - and the initial approval studies should a very unimpressive response. Yes, improvement in AIMS was statistically significant, but the magnitude was negligible. Even on the package insert, the clinical data is... lacking - the mean change in AIMS score is about -2 and about -3 for the 80 mg dose. Of course, at the dinner I attended the presenter showed these amazing pre/post videos of supposed patients where the AIMS seemed to go from 28 to 0.
Whatever the cost is now, anything about about tree fiddy is too much IMO.