Personally I think they should kick medical students out for a DUI conviction. I have no sympathy at all for people that drive intoxicated and risk the lives of innocent travelers, like me and my family.
This comment highlights the problem with DUIs. The majority of society seems to view it as a black and white crime and only hears DUI and thinks the same thing for every case, when it reality it is not clear cut at all and highly variable depending on the case. DUI did not used to be a crime of moral turpitude, but now it is. We elected and re-elected a president with a history of drunk driving and DUI after all, and this was only 15 years ago. Other crimes, such as driving while on legally prescribed narcotics or texting and driving, which can be just as dangerous if not more dangerous are not on the same level because the recreational use of alcohol is not involved. In some states, DUI offenders can be convicted of second degree murder if a death results, whether or not alcohol is proven to be the cause of the crash. There is, to me at least, a very clear difference between a first-time offender who is pulled over for a broken headlight or winds up in a checkpoint and blows a 0.09 after having 3 beers at dinner versus a habitual offender who intentionally goes to the bar with the plan of drinking 10-12 beers and driving home and blows a 0.30. There is a difference to me between a 21 year old college kid who is out partying with his friends and gets drunk and makes the dumb, alcohol-fueled decision to drive a block to his home so his car doesn't get towed vs. the 50 year old day drinking attorney who takes a roadtrip and stops for a couple of shots every hour.
But the way laws are now, most DUIs are equal unless they involve bodily harm or a death, in which case they can even become second-degree murder even if you are at 0.09 and the crash was the other driver's fault. If alcohol is involved, somebody must pay -- it's never an accident, even if it is. It's a crime that people love to shame people for, and I don't necessarily think that's fair unless the circumstances are known. If you ever got drunk at all in your early 20s, chances are you at some point drove over the legal limit, and chances are you never got caught. Hopefully you realized what you did the next morning and never did it again, but usually people just rationalize and deny it as a defense mechanism: 'oh I only had 3 beers, and they were light beers, so I was almost definitely under the limit.' Virtually all of my friends in college drove at least once while they were questionable, and all of these people are leading healthy, productive lives, raising families, and being gainfully employed contributors in society. There were a smaller minority who regularly got
very drunk and drove. (and unfortunately I still saw some of this behavior in medical students and even residents). Usually the latter group is the ones who get in legal trouble if they don't grow up and change their ways, but every once in a while somebody from the former category got unlucky and thrown in the drunk tank. I do not think that it is fair to ruin the life of a young person like this. But getting 2 DUIs is pretty damning evidence that you weren't one of these unlucky ones.
But this doesn't change the fact that most people don't approach this subject rationally with a bleeding heart like I do. Society as a whole, fueled by groups like MADD which demonize alcohol use, will view you as a social deviant only 1 step above child molester if you have a DUI. You don't really have any choice but to accept this, whether it's fair or not, and act accordingly.