- Joined
- Nov 21, 1998
- Messages
- 13,144
- Reaction score
- 7,729

Muddled Picture for Antidepressant as Osteoarthritis Pain Reliever
Trial in primary care setting fails to confirm benefit seen in specialty clinics
Co-interventions
Patients in the duloxetine group contacted their GP more frequently (51.8% vs 30.8% at 3 months, Table 3) and were more often referred to an orthopaedic surgeon (10.7% vs 3.8% at 3 months).
In the total follow-up time, 5 patients in the duloxetine group had a THR or TKR while none of the patients receiving usual care had a THR or TKR.
Patients treated according to usual care used more NSAIDs (48.1% vs 28.1% at 3 months) and opioids (11.5% vs 3.6% at 3 months), and were more likely to receive a corticosteroid injection (6.0 vs 1.8% at 3 months)
legit OA pain is not going to respond. I think it’s helpful for neuropathic pain, and very tolerable. Helps for fibro and myofascial pain.I remember the promise of cymbalta when I was a resident. I’m much more jaded now and literally never use it for anything but 3rd tier for neuropathic pain.
Other than neuropathic pain, I can count one hand patients said it made a noticeable difference for any other source of pain.
Yup. Only for fake OA pain.legit OA pain is not going to respond. I think it’s helpful for neuropathic pain, and very tolerable. Helps for fibro and myofascial pain.
NNT is better than most (all) we dolegit OA pain is not going to respond. I think it’s helpful for neuropathic pain, and very tolerable. Helps for fibro and myofascial pain.
legit OA pain is not going to respond. I think it’s helpful for neuropathic pain, and very tolerable. Helps for fibro and myofascial pain.
NNT treat is based on the initial industry studies which have now been discredited which is the point of this thread.NNT is better than most (all) we do
Indeed, I would argue that it’s such a low risk medicine it’s still worth a try. Certainly lower risk than opioids and NSAIDs, what else do we have when people don’t want an injection or ablation or PT?NNT treat is based on the initial industry studies which have now been discredited which is the point of this thread.
I'm very certain that epidurals for radiculopathy, weight loss/steroid/PRP injections for peripheral joint OA, and RFA for spinal facet OA all have vastly superior NNT than cymbalta in the real (non medicaid) world.
Dipri- agree cymbalta can help decrease pain amplification in fibro/depression patients, but I don't think it does jack $hit for the actual OA pain. These type patients I make recs and refer back to PCP anyway with those recs, or my clinic would be clogged with them.
Tramadol.Indeed, I would argue that it’s such a low risk medicine it’s still worth a try. Certainly lower risk than opioids and NSAIDs, what else do we have when people don’t want an injection or ablation or PT?
this group could not post an NNT for long term disability or long term pain because there was no benefit.The NNT (a measure of clinical efficacy) for short-term pain reduction in 14 radiculopathy is 7, meaning that if 7 patients are treated 1 additional patient will have any degree 15 of pain relief. The CI for the NNT was 4-15, meaning that between 4 and 15 patients might have 16 to be treated for 1 additional patient to derive any pain relief. In radiculopathy, for short-term 17 disability, the NNT is 10 (95% CI, 6 to 32). The small effect size and the modest clinical efficacy 18 for short-term benefit need to be considered when using ESIs for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
If it's legitimate arthritis... the body has a way of shutting that downlegit OA pain is not going to respond. I think it’s helpful for neuropathic pain, and very tolerable. Helps for fibro and myofascial pain.
I know it is possible but I have still not seen a single case of tramadol abuse in 12 years of private practice.tramadol is an opioid legally, and patients can become dependent or addicted. imo and those of the DEA, tramadol does not appear to be a routine drug to use.
===
as a pain physician and not an interventionalist exclusively, i utilize interventions are one aspect of pain management, but not the only one. medications - even if they there is the potential they may not work, just like injections - are one of those aspects to consider.
===
the best i can find for NNT for injections are that epidural injections and TF injections for short term pain have an NNT of 7 based on this consensus statement drawn up by neurology.
this group could not post an NNT for long term disability or long term pain because there was no benefit.
yes, no NNT for chronic radicular pain or spinal stenosis.
the NNT from duloxetine appears to be between 5 and 7 for osteoarthritis.
Duloxetine in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain - PMC
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is among the most frequent painful complaints that healthcare providers address. The bulk of these complaints are chronic low back pain and chronic osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis in ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
it may be 4 to 6 for diabetic neuropathy and for fibromyalgia
Duloxetine: painful diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgia
Duloxetine: painful diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgiawww.bandolier.org.uk
Agree with this. Particularly it’s the person not the drug. Idiots will take anything to feel like something other than themselves, which is addiction 101. That doesn't mean tramadol is particularly addictive.It's the person and not the drug. Hmm, sounds like SOS or juice the vig.
Tramadol has abuse potential. I've seen one.
Agree with this. Particularly it’s the person not the drug. Idiots will take anything to feel like something other than themselves, which is addiction 101. That doesn't mean tramadol is particularly addictive.
As mentioned above I don't write any kind of prescription even NSAIDS or gabapentin to slugs or patients with mostly mental issues, not anatomic issues, as I don't want to establish a relationship and I don't want to see them again.
So in the resulting non psych cohort you can write tramadol to anyone. Duct sees lots of medicaid which is psych by another name over half of the time, and the psychiatrist poster obviously sees major head cases. Apples and oranges to my population which is medicare and hardworking patients on commercial insurance.
good idea. Do you start them separately to assess side effects from each individual drug? Which do you start with first if you are assuming you'll end up on both?I do a good amount of gabapentin and cymbalta combo prescriptiions. Seems to work fairly well with minimal side effects. No slugs in my practice. I think the polypharmacy is synergistic and typically need to get cymbalta to 60mg. Certainly not a cure all but covers myofascial and neuropathic pain decently.
Hey buddy; I don't start them separately as it would take too long to follow them and titrate up, but there is nothing wrong if you choose to do that. I start gabapentin at 600-900 MG PO TID and Cymbalta 30mg PO QAM x 2 weeks increase to 60mg QAM thereafter. Re-eval in a month or two. Tell them it is going to take a month to see benefit.good idea. Do you start them separately to assess side effects from each individual drug? Which do you start with first if you are assuming you'll end up on both?
As it seems 1/3 of the doctor going US population is on an SSRI, how does that influence you?
That is a bit aggressive for me unless we are talking CRPS type neuropathic pain. You start some patients on gaba 900 TID?Hey buddy; I don't start them separately as it would take too long to follow them and titrate up, but there is nothing wrong if you choose to do that. I start gabapentin at 600-900 MG PO TID and Cymbalta 30mg PO QAM x 2 weeks increase to 60mg QAM thereafter. Re-eval in a month or two. Tell them it is going to take a month to see benefit.
If they are on an SSRI or TCA, either I have time stop for 1-2 weeks if it is some bull**** med like a tricicylic that is snowing them, or have them ask their psychiatrist to switch them to cymbalta and they psychiatrist can handle it and also monitor the psych effects. A good amount of the folks I see are on a TCA for pain and cannot tolerate it.
As I write this is sound complicated but really its not.
I am aggressive with cymalta, I get up to 60 mg fairly quickly. I always start gaba 300 and titrate to TID over weeks. Even then many people get side effects.That is a bit aggressive for me unless we are talking CRPS type neuropathic pain. You start some patients on gaba 900 TID?
I know you are trying to cancel out side effects from each drug, but most non obese patients starting gabapentin can barely tolerate 300 TID and most patients starting cymbalta can barely tolerate 30mg.
Maybe I'm being a wimp about this, but I guess I would feel more comfortable starting Cymbalta 30mg and gabapentin 300 TID for a month, and recheck for medication tolerance after that.
That is a bit aggressive for me unless we are talking CRPS type neuropathic pain. You start some patients on gaba 900 TID?
I know you are trying to cancel out side effects from each drug, but most non obese patients starting gabapentin can barely tolerate 300 TID and most patients starting cymbalta can barely tolerate 30mg.
Maybe I'm being a wimp about this, but I guess I would feel more comfortable starting Cymbalta 30mg and gabapentin 300 TID for a month, and recheck for medication tolerance after that.
Cymbalta: 30mg qd x 7d then 60mg qd
Gabapentin titration: 300 qhs x3d, 300 bid x3d, 300 tid x3d, 300/300/600, 300/600/600, 600/600/600. Each step is 3 days. Titration on my short list in EHR so 1 click and it prints.
Effective dose range of gabapentin is 1800-2700mg divided bid or tid.
Would push to 900 tid and if no better, dc.Do you increase past 600 TID if they haven’t noticed any improvement? I always thought if no improvement at 1800 daily very unlikely to notice improvement higher, but if some improvement at 1800 then it’s reasonable to try higher, as tolerated.
I will only increase to 300 TID. I read somewhere that there is minimal increased efficacy above that dose.Do you increase past 600 TID if they haven’t noticed any improvement? I always thought if no improvement at 1800 daily very unlikely to notice improvement higher, but if some improvement at 1800 then it’s reasonable to try higher, as tolerated.
I will only increase to 300 TID. I read somewhere that there is minimal increased efficacy above that dose.
I’ve definitely seen patients do better on higher doses than 300mg TID……if they can tolerate the sedation.I will only increase to 300 TID. I read somewhere that there is minimal increased efficacy above that dose.
If they do not have side effects but report it does not work, consider getting in range. It is not a failure until they have side effects that don't resolve in 3-4 days or dose reached 2700mg.The difference in 1800 and 3600 is side effects, not efficacy.
I think 1200 to 1800 is worthwhile.
Vast majority of my gabapentin is 100mg TID.
Agree. I do a lot of that dosing as well.That’s a very black and white way to treat gabapentin. I have a lot of patients who do well with asymmetrical dosing, like 400mg qAM and 800mg qHS, no post lunch drowsiness and sleep like a baby