E.M. vs I.M.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Was pretty sure EM but have been thinking a bit how I might actually like a mix of outpatient and inpatient, having my own office, etc. Any unique besides the usual obvious considerations?

Sent from my SM-N910P using SDN mobile

I'm in the same situation. I've been thinking IM more and more. Although, overall, I think IM works more and makes less. I prefer the hospitalist route over clinic for me though. For EM, some people think that CMGs aren't that big of a deal, but having seen private/democratic EM groups go down first hand losing out their hospital contracts/selling themselves off to CMGs and getting a nice and cool 50% pay cut makes me pretty weary of the future. EM is peaking right now/or soon to peak as well and jumping on while it's hot might not be the best idea. I wouldn't care all that much if I didn't have >250k debt upon graduation.
 
EM peaking now? Ive been told the opposite from EM attendings. The need is going up and supply is still down. Just curious how you came to this conclusion because I am very interested in EM 🙂

Thank you.
 
IM Outpatient / your own practice:

Reimbursement / overhead is going to be painful to deal with. One possible route to explore is cash-only practices. I know someone who has this, but it's taken him awhile to build. He even admits that he has to take on extra gigs to make things float.
 
EM peaking now? Ive been told the opposite from EM attendings. The need is going up and supply is still down. Just curious how you came to this conclusion because I am very interested in EM 🙂

Thank you.
supply and demand isn't the only player in compensation
some fields that are in dire need such as primary care and child psychiatry arn't reimbursed well.
 
Well I guess one thing to consider is that hospitalists are booming because people don't like to have an outpatient practice along with admitting their own patients. Also, EM is clearly the best.
 
supply and demand isn't the only player in compensation
some fields that are in dire need such as primary care and child psychiatry arn't reimbursed well.
Child psychiatry is reimbursed fairly well when you consider the number of hours worked and the salary. They also make more than pediatricians. I think fields like primary care and psychiatry will see an increase in salary over the next several years. Or at least I hope. 😛

FWIW I strongly considered EM for a while but like the OP it came down to having an office and maintaining long-term relationships with patients. If those things are really important to you, definitely look into IM or other fields. You can do so much with IM. Also I agree, EM will peak sooner or later what with all of the popularity considering the "lifestyle" and pay. Switching between day and night shifts isn't very appealing imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W19
getting to see cool stuff, do some procedures, make bank and sweet hours
So.. like pulm/critical care... you know... after the ED has filtered out the urgent care patients? Actually, the same for hospitalist work as well. Same benefit of having the gigantic ED filter filtering out the 70% +/- urgent care type patients.
 
For me E.M. is great because of procedures, cool emergent stuff (though 90% isn't), and good "lifestyle"

But as strange as it sounds, I actually do want to have an outpatient practice and an inpatient practice if possible. I would like the be the guy that gets woken up at 3am for a consult. I would like to have some patients that I have a long-term relationship with. Etc.

Seems weird but its the truth.
 
what was it that appealed the MOST to you about EM?

getting to see cool stuff, do some procedures, make bank and sweet hours

i asked the op actually. trying to find common ground in IM somewhere based on their specific answer

Essentially everything he listed is what I find appealing about E.M. I am also interested in Pulm/CCM, but now you can get to CCM via E.M. as well.

Big problem with me is, I don't know if I can tolerate making so little $ for a whole nother 6 years. At least with E.M. if I am burned out I can just stop after 3 years and still do very well (and probably be OK with an EM career I think).
With IM, I really have no interest at all in primary care or being a hospitalist. I actually find the prospect of either a borderline nightmare. I would pretty much be committing to doing a fellowship of some kind.

Big problems with E.M. is no outpatient practice, very high burnout/hating 50% or more of patients, probably being forced to supervise mid-levels (could be wrong here, but that anesthesiology model seems to be creeping in here and there), not really being an expert in any specific area, dealing with a-hole consultants, being tied down to a hospital system. Also fewer fellowship options.

As far as the experience of residency itself, I don't know which would be more grueling, 3 years of EM or 3 years of IM, probably entirely program dependent.
 
Big problems with E.M. is no outpatient practice
Outpatient medicine has a lot of hidden BS that you won't see in med school. I know plenty of attendings/residents who got burned out of filling out disability forms, insurance forms, forms for other forms, etc so they did ANOTHER residency in EM. I rarely hear the reverse.

very high burnout/hating 50% or more of patients
First part is a myth. EM is actually not significantly higher than other specialties and also most of the older docs are currently being burned out because they suck with EMRs and weren't EM trained to begin with.

Second part is dependent on where you work. I enjoy way more than 50% of my patients but one hospital I trained at I hated way more than 50% of my patients. You can find a good community, just takes time.

probably being forced to supervise mid-levels (could be wrong here, but that anesthesiology model seems to be creeping in here and there)
It's funny how I always read all the bad things about midlevels on these boards. I know far more great (than bad) PA's and cRNAs that I would let treat me or my family in the ER or the OR in a heartbeat. You always hear the horror stories. You rarely hear the reality.

not really being an expert in any specific area
Your knowledge base is your own priority. You can learn whatever you want to learn. The job definitely doesn't require expert knowledge of everything but you can work hard and become competent.

dealing with a-hole consultants, being tied down to a hospital system.
Depends on where you work.

Also fewer fellowship options.
This is true.

As far as the experience of residency itself, I don't know which would be more grueling, 3 years of EM or 3 years of IM, probably entirely program dependent.
It all sucks but EM has more time off both during residency and afterwards.

Hope that helps!
 
It's funny how I always read all the bad things about midlevels on these boards. I know far more great (than bad) PA's and cRNAs that I would let treat me or my family in the ER or the OR in a heartbeat. You always hear the horror stories. You rarely hear the reality.

That is hardly a reassuring thought when discussing a specialty that is witnessing midlevel creep. The true horror is precisely great and competent midlevels that can do your job just fine. Let's not kid ourselves. lol
 
So.. like pulm/critical care... you know... after the ED has filtered out the urgent care patients? Actually, the same for hospitalist work as well. Same benefit of having the gigantic ED filter filtering out the 70% +/- urgent care type patients.
I guess besides treating chf, copd and diabetes for 3 years and also not having to be in the ICU. Interesting stuff, just not for me.

Hospitalist is cool from a lifestyle perspective but I'm not a big IM guy
 
I don't think having a "mix" is worth the switch.

If you're truly in the middle b/w EM and IM, I'd advise you to go for EM in a heartbeat. More money, better hours (if you can handle the schedule shifts, which you presumably can, if you've been leaning toward EM), and ready to go after three years (four in some programs).
 
I guess besides treating chf, copd and diabetes for 3 years and also not having to be in the ICU. Interesting stuff, just not for me.

Hospitalist is cool from a lifestyle perspective but I'm not a big IM guy


Want to guess who sees those CHF, COPD, and diabetes patients first? It's not the hospitalist.

Also, you want to see cool stuff and do cool things but don't want to go to the place where that is all concentrated? The ED be packing armpits with ice for theraputic hypothermia while the intensivist is sinking the icy cath femoral central line to provide an actual controlled theraputic hypothermia.
 
Avoiding EM because night shifts ostensibly increase the risk of cancer seems like a decision made on dubious grounds. Seems like anything and everything causes cancer. Just live life and deal with this stuff as it comes. Oh, and always be on the lookout for unintentional weight loss or sx of anemia.
 
How difficult is it to obtain a CCM only fellowship (from IM) since the forum is deader than dead and no one responds?
 
I've met a handful of physicians who did a combination IM/EM residency, and they've strongly endorsed that to me.
 
I've met a handful of physicians who did a combination IM/EM residency, and they've strongly endorsed that to me.
What's the point of that though? I could see the combined program if you can get into the 1 year CCM fellowship (so 6 years for IM-EM-CC). But just IM/EM, I imagine people probably do one or the other?
 
Combined residencies are worthless unless you are looking for some sort of academic niche. Don't do a combined residency just because you cannot choose between the two specialties, that's just going to be a $600k mistake.
 
But what if I do shift work and go ketogenic? Will I still get cancer?
 
Combined residencies are worthless unless you are looking for some sort of academic niche. Don't do a combined residency just because you cannot choose between the two specialties, that's just going to be a $600k mistake.

Not sure why it'd be a $600k mistake. Most of the people I know who did IM/EM or IM/Peds couldn't decide in medical school. They get boarded in both and have more options down the line. Ultimately, most end up picking one or the other, but it's hardly a huge mistake.
 
Not sure why it'd be a $600k mistake. Most of the people I know who did IM/EM or IM/Peds couldn't decide in medical school. They get boarded in both and have more options down the line. Ultimately, most end up picking one or the other, but it's hardly a huge mistake.
Average ER doctor makes $320k/yr (even more in places like Texas). EM/IM takes 5 years to complete, or an added two years to most EM training. Include the added two years of the inability to pay back loans, then do the math. Giving up two more years of your life and $600k is a pretty big mistake if you end up only practicing in either EM or IM rather than both.
 
Not sure why it'd be a $600k mistake. Most of the people I know who did IM/EM or IM/Peds couldn't decide in medical school. They get boarded in both and have more options down the line. Ultimately, most end up picking one or the other, but it's hardly a huge mistake.

extra 2-3 years for being boarded in something you never use, with an opportunity cost of 600K sounds like a pretty big mistake...
 
I know some EM/IM graduates. Most do ER and a couple did CC.
 
If you can't decide, you can't decide. 5 years isn't that bad. Viewing life entirely from the perspective of opportunity cost is incredibly disheartening, not to mention impractical.
 
I know some EM/IM graduates. Most do ER and a couple did CC.

Exactly.

Almost all the EM/IM folks end up doing either EM or CC or both.

Now that the EM-CC path is approved the extra 2 years of IM training is literally just throwing money down the drain.
 
Average ER doctor makes $320k/yr (even more in places like Texas). EM/IM takes 5 years to complete, or an added two years to most EM training. Include the added two years of the inability to pay back loans, then do the math. Giving up two more years of your life and $600k is a pretty big mistake if you end up only practicing in either EM or IM rather than both.

I was under the impression EM/IM was 4 years. My mistake.
 
That is hardly a reassuring thought when discussing a specialty that is witnessing midlevel creep. The true horror is precisely great and competent midlevels that can do your job just fine. Let's not kid ourselves. lol
This might shock you, but most people who arrive in the emergency department are not having an emergency. This is where midlevel are utilized: mostly in level 4s and 5s with some 3s. You don't have a nurse grab the midlevel for the level 1s; they are grabbing the doctor. Reality is our jobs are super-ultra-mega secure in EM due to the high risk med legal nature of true emergencies. We just utilize a midlevel to see the non-emergent EMTALA BS we have to deal with on a daily basis.
 
This might shock you, but most people who arrive in the emergency department are not having an emergency. This is where midlevel are utilized: mostly in level 4s and 5s with some 3s. You don't have a nurse grab the midlevel for the level 1s; they are grabbing the doctor. Reality is our jobs are super-ultra-mega secure in EM due to the high risk med legal nature of true emergencies. We just utilize a midlevel to see the non-emergent EMTALA BS we have to deal with on a daily basis.

I understand that. At the same time, isn't it by definition the "most" people who arrive without having a true emergency who are also paying most of the bills? So at the end of the day, midlevels reduce the overall demand for EPs, and since EM is a specialty where the docs are basically a commodity and get paid flat hourly, this reduction in demand leads to a reduction in hourly rates. At least that's how simple economic analysis would have it, anyway:shrug:

Maybe in a PP setting where you guys hire midlevels and get to bill for their work while giving them a flat salary you'd benefit financially, but from what I read on the EM forum PP is in a similar spot as Kasich's presidential campaign, so increasing midlevel utilization simply shifts the EM supply-demand equilibrium against you guys without letting you capture any financial windfalls through employing said midlevels. That windfall just goes to the CMGs.
 
Last edited:
I think IM works more and makes less.

More money, better hours (if you can handle the schedule shifts, which you presumably can, if you've been leaning toward EM), and ready to go after three years (four in some programs).

As someone who started med school wanting to do EM and am about to start pulm/CC fellowship after IM residency....

Not all hours are created equal. In IM you rarely are working at 100% effort or capacity. In fact you're getting paid to sleep in the hospital sometimes both in residency and as an attending. In EM you are almost always going at 110% effort and 150% capacity (depending on where you work obviously). The unpredictability of EM is also very unsettling to me. Add to all this that with 90% of the patients having non-emergent/bogus complaints (I had one pt in the ED who came to get her cold sore checked out... she was concerned it meant her boyfriend was cheating on her... when she complained about the wait I calmly explained to her that there are patients with more emergent complaints to which she replied "this is an emergency to me" :wtf:), homeless people using the ED as a shelter, police dropping off drunks, the expectation of patients that you "fix" their problem, the expectation of the hospital administration that you kick them out the door in the blink of an eye. No thanks. I definitely made the right decision staying away from EM.
 
As someone who started med school wanting to do EM and am about to start pulm/CC fellowship after IM residency....

Not all hours are created equal. In IM you rarely are working at 100% effort or capacity. In fact you're getting paid to sleep in the hospital sometimes both in residency and as an attending. In EM you are almost always going at 110% effort and 150% capacity (depending on where you work obviously). The unpredictability of EM is also very unsettling to me. Add to all this that with 90% of the patients having non-emergent/bogus complaints (I had one pt in the ED who came to get her cold sore checked out... she was concerned it meant her boyfriend was cheating on her... when she complained about the wait I calmly explained to her that there are patients with more emergent complaints to which she replied "this is an emergency to me" :wtf:), homeless people using the ED as a shelter, police dropping off drunks, the expectation of patients that you "fix" their problem, the expectation of the hospital administration that you kick them out the door in the blink of an eye. No thanks. I definitely made the right decision staying away from EM.

Thanks. What's the feel for pulm/CC right now? Increasing in competitiveness? Edit: I am a dirty DO though.
 
Thanks. What's the feel for pulm/CC right now? Increasing in competitiveness? Edit: I am a dirty DO though.

It has increased in competitiveness during recent years but is leveling off. Solidly in the top 4 IM sub-specialties with cards, GI and heme/onc.
Slightly over half of positions go to US MDs. That being said only 40 (8%) positions went to DOs this year. Unfortunately there are no information on number of DOs who applied to each specialty. Definitely a uphill battle for you but if you do residency at a university hospital you would improve your chances.

EDIT: meant to include the link http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Results-and-Data-SMS-2016_Final.pdf
 
Exactly.

Almost all the EM/IM folks end up doing either EM or CC or both.

Now that the EM-CC path is approved the extra 2 years of IM training is literally just throwing money down the drain.
EM-CC is 'approved' as in there is no longer a 25% cap on EM residents in IM programs?
 
As someone who started med school wanting to do EM and am about to start pulm/CC fellowship after IM residency....

Not all hours are created equal. In IM you rarely are working at 100% effort or capacity. In fact you're getting paid to sleep in the hospital sometimes both in residency and as an attending. In EM you are almost always going at 110% effort and 150% capacity (depending on where you work obviously). The unpredictability of EM is also very unsettling to me. Add to all this that with 90% of the patients having non-emergent/bogus complaints (I had one pt in the ED who came to get her cold sore checked out... she was concerned it meant her boyfriend was cheating on her... when she complained about the wait I calmly explained to her that there are patients with more emergent complaints to which she replied "this is an emergency to me" :wtf:), homeless people using the ED as a shelter, police dropping off drunks, the expectation of patients that you "fix" their problem, the expectation of the hospital administration that you kick them out the door in the blink of an eye. No thanks. I definitely made the right decision staying away from EM.

You see, this is exactly why I f*in love EM, and why I want to go into it. I spent a lot of time feeling anxious about this particular choice for a while, but having experienced both rotations it's hard for me to feel that way anymore. I love being at the hospital when I am doing something, even if it's just chatting with the weird lady who says a cold sore is an emergency. I can't stand being somewhere and not being busy

Variety is cool, different patients (kiddos, adults, pregnant ladies) is cool, trauma is cool, but it's the bustle that makes me feel happier in the ED than on IM.
 
You see, this is exactly why I f*in love EM, and why I want to go into it. I spent a lot of time feeling anxious about this particular choice for a while, but having experienced both rotations it's hard for me to feel that way anymore. I love being at the hospital when I am doing something, even if it's just chatting with the weird lady who says a cold sore is an emergency. I can't stand being somewhere and not being busy

Variety is cool, different patients (kiddos, adults, pregnant ladies) is cool, trauma is cool, but it's the bustle that makes me feel happier in the ED than on IM.

perfect example of different strokes... I never wanted to take care of another child or pregnant lady ever again

more power to you
 
Here is my pro/con list I shared recently with @MeatTornado, plz ridicule me as much as possible for these, hopefully while pointing out delusions.

The reasons Ive been having second thoughts on EM is
  • #1 I actually do like the idea of having an outpatient practice and not being stuck in the hospital all of the time.
  • #2 I think I might hate 50% of my patients if I did E.M.
  • #3 I think I would actually like being the person that gets the 3am phone calls because I am the expert on something as opposed to the one constantly making the 3am calls to other people who then talk down to me/lecture me/yell at me when i have 20 people waiting to be seen.
  • #4 Kind of like #1, I feel that if I have my own outpatient practice, I have some ownership of my patients and am not 100% beholden to the nuances of hospital politics and various contract issues, at the very least have a little more political power. #5 Though I am really not excited about doing research, the stuff I find most interesting (mechanical ventilation, fluid resuscitation, vasopressors/inotropes, fluids/electrolytes, and sepsis) have more prospective mentors studying these topics in IM/Pulm/CCM. Doing EM would limit my opportunities to work with people like this.
  • #6 EM/CCM would probably have fewer employment opportunities in community practice than IM/Pulm/CCM.
  • #7 More fellowship options in IM in-case I change my mind down the road.
  • #8 I want to teach medical students, and would think IM is a better place to get more consistent teaching opportunities.
  • #9 I think if I do end up getting burned out in EM, I would be absolutely miserable.

The problems I have envisioned with IM is
  • #1 Possibly being suck doing primary care or hospital medicine if I don't get into a fellowship or for some reason am too burned out to continue.
  • #2 Missing out on the so-called "excitement" of those very small % of critical patients in EM (not sure how much medical ICU work makes up for this because my own experience has been in large community hospitals, not academia).
  • #3 Less exposure to ICU procedures in IM residency as opposed to EM.
  • #4 I don't like research and have no interest in doing it, but I'm sure I would have to in order to complete a fellowship.
  • #5 General internal medicine wards are proclaimed to be a nightmare of just coordinating 5-6 different specialists and feeling like you don't make a difference.
  • #6 IM residency is proclaimed to be a horrible experience with little autonomy and a lot of mental masturbation sessions on rounds (i.e. a huge amount of frustration with how much your time is wasted).
  • #7 More mid-level creep into IM and ICU as opposed to ER, or at least it seems that way.
  • #8 Better salaries in EM than general IM (at least for right now), though most sub-specialists make more than EM.
  • #9 IM/Pulm/CC would be 6 years whereas EM/CC would be 5.
 
Are combined residencies much more competitive? I know there's obviously a lot less spots.

Less competitive now it seems. At least this year as there were two spots open. Overall, like others have said, going the combined route is only really worthwhile if you have a plan in place for using both specialties. For me, I am doing the 6 year EM/IM/CC route, so in the end it could be considered only a one year loss of wages compared to doing EM>>>CC. But, we can moonlight as an attending during our fellowship year and it is a cake year overall. I plan on doing EM and CC, likely half-time each. Will probably shoot for admin positions right off as well since being multi-boarded and working throughout the entire hospital gives me an idea of the issues faced by internists, EM docs, etc. and would likely be beneficial if doing admin.
 
Here is my pro/con list I shared recently with @MeatTornado, plz ridicule me as much as possible for these, hopefully while pointing out delusions.

The reasons Ive been having second thoughts on EM is
  • #1 I actually do like the idea of having an outpatient practice and not being stuck in the hospital all of the time.
  • :barf:
  • #2 I think I might hate 50% of my patients if I did E.M.
  • If that's the case, I think you stand a good chance of hating 50% of your patient's regardless, it's just that you'll be stuck with them for more than 8-12hrs (think days to weeks)
  • #3 I think I would actually like being the person that gets the 3am phone calls because I am the expert on something as opposed to the one constantly making the 3am calls to other people who then talk down to me/lecture me/yell at me when i have 20 people waiting to be seen.
  • Since this will never happen to you on a general medicine service 😵
  • I think that this is a syndrome of being in an academic center. Talk with some private practice folks, it's a whole different world out there. I would also argue that no matter what service you are, you will require other experts at some point (GI, Cards, neuro, etc in the ICU for instance).
  • #4 Kind of like #1, I feel that if I have my own outpatient practice, I have some ownership of my patients and am not 100% beholden to the nuances of hospital politics and various contract issues, at the very least have a little more political power.
  • No, instead you'll get to bend over for CMS or some insurance executive. I guess you can at least have some variety though. The exception is maybe in a concierge practice, but I can only imagine the pain if you accidentally pick up a couple of borderline personality/severe anxiety disorder people in such a practice.
  • #5 Though I am really not excited about doing research, the stuff I find most interesting (mechanical ventilation, fluid resuscitation, vasopressors/inotropes, fluids/electrolytes, and sepsis) have more prospective mentors studying these topics in IM/Pulm/CCM. Doing EM would limit my opportunities to work with people like this.
  • Probably true, but that will still be important to EM practice.
  • #6 EM/CCM would probably have fewer employment opportunities in community practice than IM/Pulm/CCM.
  • Maybe. However, given the shortage of CC people I doubt you'd end up unemployed
  • #7 More fellowship options in IM in-case I change my mind down the road.
  • Accurate, but not a selling point to me, different strokes I guess. Personally, if I end up burned out it's probably going to be on medicine in general, not just my particular specialty. I'll likely leave the field entirely for either admin or a computer science/workflow type of deal (e.g. EMR company)
  • #8 I want to teach medical students, and would think IM is a better place to get more consistent teaching opportunities.
  • This probably depends more on you than the specialty
  • #9 I think if I do end up getting burned out in EM, I would be absolutely miserable.
  • I think this will be true regardless of specialty.

The problems I have envisioned with IM is
  • #1 Possibly being suck doing primary care or hospital medicine if I don't get into a fellowship or for some reason am too burned out to continue.
  • See my response to #1 above
  • #2 Missing out on the so-called "excitement" of those very small % of critical patients in EM (not sure how much medical ICU work makes up for this because my own experience has been in large community hospitals, not academia).
  • this depends on where you practice. Some places, the ED is a glorified urgent care/fm practice without continuity. Others, you will run every code and trauma that comes in multiple times per day. It totally depends on where you are. Personally, I actually find the "small %" to be one of the exciting things about EM: a lot of super-sick people don't look like it immediately.
  • #3 Less exposure to ICU procedures in IM residency as opposed to EM.
  • Yeah, this will depend on where you are. To my understanding, some IM residencies will give you a ****-ton of procedural experience. By and large though, probably true.
  • #4 I don't like research and have no interest in doing it, but I'm sure I would have to in order to complete a fellowship.
  • Mwam wam noises
  • #5 General internal medicine wards are proclaimed to be a nightmare of just coordinating 5-6 different specialists and feeling like you don't make a difference.
  • Depends where you are.
  • #6 IM residency is proclaimed to be a horrible experience with little autonomy and a lot of mental masturbation sessions on rounds (i.e. a huge amount of frustration with how much your time is wasted).
  • I think it depends on attitude, but I sympathize with this. I thought that it was usually incredibly interesting sometimes. Though I did frequently consider throwing myself off the roof when we debated between different diuretics or statins at equivalent strengths.
  • #7 More mid-level creep into IM and ICU as opposed to ER, or at least it seems that way.
  • I honestly think this is mostly SDN hysteria. There is so much work to be done, and I'm glad that mid-levels take what usually sucks the most out of our jobs.
  • #8 Better salaries in EM than general IM (at least for right now), though most sub-specialists make more than EM.
  • Not necessarily per hour. But this will likely change multiple times during our career.
  • #9 IM/Pulm/CC would be 6 years whereas EM/CC would be 5.
  • This assumes you still want to do CC in three years, but yeah, true. Personally I wanted to do CC for quite a while (the unit is just a very cool place), but I always hear from pulm docs about how they like pulm better than the unit further in their careers.

You sound an awful lot like an internist. That's the worst I got 😛

I included comments above from my perspective, which you might not be interested in seeing as I'm in the same year as you.

Overall it sounds like you really want to do IM, with the only fear being the uncertainty of getting a specialty placement. That sounds like a uniquely terrible reason to do EM. It's hard to want to woo someone into a specialty that they clearly don't enjoy as much as another one. It's a bit of a turn-off, like trying to talk with a guy/gal who won't give you the time of day and is making googly eyes at someone else.

Having said that, I hope you end up doing what you like, and not doing stuff based on BS SDN hysteria. I really like EM, but I totally get why someone would love IM. It's intellectually stimulating, you get to take "proper" care of people, take into account the whole history, and you can be there from the moment they are admitted until the day that they return to the nursing or funeral home (I kid, I kid).

My list of Cons for IM
1. Placement and social work BS
Watching someone spend multiple days in the hospital (or weeks sometimes) for no reason just kills me. It puts those patients at so many risks, and seeing this happen on a daily basis was probably the main reason that I simply can't do IM. There are elements of this in the ED as well, but they make up a far smaller portion of your day. I am feeling residual anger and frustration just thinking about this right now.
2. Placement and social work BS (it should be mentioned twice)
3. Rounding
4. Slow spots (kill me )
5. No kiddos. Sad face (however, comes with the corresponding positive...no parents)
6. Family has time and ability to dump stuff on you that is in no way your job
7. Increased paperwork and charting burden
8. Less trauma/fun stuff
9. Less procedures

However, I know for some folks my list of cons is actually a list of pros. I've met people who wanna do palliative who get super-excited about family meetings. I've also met people who worship the potassium channel and the differencese between bumex and lasix (holy be its name). If it's the right choice for you, go for it man. I hope it makes you happy 🙂
 
Top