ECT and seizure duration

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Chrismander

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
197
Reaction score
4
Hi all.

I'm currently assisting my attending with ECT on a 78 y/o male with lifelong intermittent depression, now substantially worse as he's gotten older. Some suspicion for bipolar depression though no clear recent mania or hypomania. Currently on venlafaxine and being switched from abilify to seroquel. Has tried a dozen or so other agents from every class other than MAOI. Only things he hasn't tried are ltihium (got it once in his 20's had a "bad reaction" that he can't remember and refuses to try it) and T3.

He had first gotten a course of ECT in his 20's. Then about 8 years ago a brief course here, and was maintained on meds until about 4 months ago. Got 6 or 8 treatments this fall on an inpatient basis and was transitioned to maintenance ECT. He never improved 100% but is kinda crotchety even at baseline so he never admits he's better. But still, had started grooming appropriately, wearing street clothes, joking with nurses, playing games with other patients, but wouldn't subjectively admit he was better. He continued on maintenance ECT for ~2 months but missed a session due to being in the hospital with pneumonia and had decompensated in that short time span (he was also being tapered from q3w to q4w at the time of the pneumonia, so maybe it was the combo that did him in).

We started a new index course of ECT approx 3 weeks ago. He's improved since then but only slightly. One of my concerns is that the seizure length is only 8-12 seconds per ECT (at best!) despite being at 100% of energy for the machine. Some of the seizures are only like 5-6 seconds. At the other site I've done ECT at the attending is always aiming for 30-60 seconds. There's been some increase in confusion to him. Now I worry that we're giving him cognitive s/e for potentially minimal gain. In the fall they got mostly 20-40s seizures (with one or two mini-seizures of 4 seconds) with much lower energy, but they were using etomidate. Now anesthesia is using propofol. My attending sympathizes but is reluctant to use caffeine (a. fib, though we haven't had cards weigh in) and gas is reluctant to go back to etomidate because they blame it for one episode of postictal confusion/agitation requiring haldol. I of course want to try out ketamine, but good luck trying to sell that.

So this is a long winded way of asking, what do you guys think about seizure length in ECT? I know a lot of books make vague hand-wavey gestures about "postictal suppression index" but is seizure length still a valid measure? Do you in your ECT practice aim for longer seizures than I'm getting here?
 
It's been a while, but if I remember correctly that duration is a bit short.

I couln't remember correctly so I looked it up and Dr. Gorman Tarbell is the chap you want here.

only joking
 
In the old days we use to want a seizure duration that was longer than 30 seconds but the more recent data indicate that seizure duration is not an important parameter in predicting response. A patient just needs to have a seizure (at a certain amount above seizure threshold). However, there is still the issue of defining a seizure (e.g. is one second of seizure activity a seizure?). At our institution we have defined a "seizure" as 10 seconds. By that some of your treatments still might not be adequate. We have standardized on etomidate here and have had good success with it. If we do get post-ictal emergence delirium we just use iv propofol to put the patient back down and they then reawaken fine. The other option you have is to decrease the pulse width as wider pulse widths have been associated with higher seizure thresholds (and maybe more cognitive impairment).
 
Top