Explaining GPA - Help

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Practitioner

Full Member
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
*sigh*

I was wondering if I should (and if it would help) to explain my GPA to admission committees. In my future application and now in LOIs I'm sending out.

Let me explain in detail and see what you think:

I started college in an accelerated 2yr premed program. So I took all the prereqs in the first two years of college. Meaning my transcript is calculus/bio/gchem/phys/ochem/psych/biochem for the first two years. In addition to medical eithics, neuroscience, immunology, and one literature course.

The first four semesters GPA are roughly: 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 3.1.

Throughout I had great time/work management but the worst work ethic. Bs were my no-effort grade and the extra effort to get As were not worth the reward of A. For the first two semesters.

By the third I learned and worked to get As and did, straight As and one B in neuroscience.

Then things messed up in the fourth semseter: First, I went through a breakup after ~2.5 yrs. I know, everyone, or a lot of us, have had this experience and you know how it sucks everything out of you. But also my dad lost his job and my sister's college shut down her program, so my whole family was in limbo. We had only moved 4 years before that.

So all in all, I left the program (part by choice and part forced to) and transferred to the USA to continue undergrad.

Over the next year my GPAs in range: 3.5, 3.5.

Needless to say, I was depressed and was trying to use studying as an outlet and it was working only slightly. At the end of the year, mostly due to college expenses with dad loosing job, I had to transfer again to a cheaper in-state school.

Over the last 3 semesters of my education GPAs: 3.7+, 3.7+, 3.3.

The last semester was a single course, and I'm averaging in summer courses to fall semester gpas.

The biggest issue is that 75% of my courses in first 3 years are strictly science, and prereqs practically all in the first 2 years. I had to repeat some introductory biology courses at my final institution, but that's it.

Now, I don't want to come up with excuses for myself because I think in all honesty I might have been able to do better even under the circumstances of moving to new location all the time and dealing with finding a new place, getting heating fixed, being away from family, parents having to move after dad's job loss, etc.

If I'm being honest to you and to myself, I think if things were a little less stressful I would have used to spare energy to enjoy myself, travel, workout, play computer games, etc than to focus more on my studies. So, knowing that, I feel irresponsible and deceitful if I were to try and explain the initial dip in my GPA and slow rise after that to the circumstances.

Still, would it be better to and should I try and explain off my low gpa or just sigh it off and try to make up for it in other parts of my application?

PS AMCAS cgpa 3.4 BCPM 3.22.

PSS I am planning on attending post-bach program at either VCU or Drexel. Have position held with Drexel and applied to VCU.
 
To be honest, I don't think there really is a good explanation here. Essentially, your grades are bad for no other reason besides you didn't want to work for them. Obviously that's not something you want to explain to adcoms.

Unfortunate situation, but I can't think of a way to explain this and somehow turning it into a positive.

On an unrelated note, thank you for putting a lot of spacing in your post.
 
I definitely wouldn't lead with "because I had no work ethic" because yeah, that sounds pretty bad in any light. You can try explaining the life situations that contributed, but I don't think they're that out of the ordinary that they would be a huge factor. I think making the other aspects of your application stand out would be the best bet.

Also, when you say you have a position held at Drexel, does that mean you got in, or are you on hold? Because if you got in, then you're all set.
 
Don't make excuses. Your grades are your grades, period.

Sometimes applicants are advised to comment in their PS on extraordinary circumstances in their life - for instance a serious illness or accident - that caused a blip in their grades for one, maybe 2 semesters.

But trying to explain away 2 years of bad grades with your tedious story that throws in everything but the kitchen sink? Umm, no - nobody wants to hear any of it.
 
I was asking because I see all the time comments about how "moving to a new city" or "dad loosing job" are used to explain bad grades.

I'm confessing that these were not the reasons for my bad grades because I'm being honest with myself. But the circumstances are true and I was wondering if I should use them as an explanation.

It was stressful moving and trying to figure how to work out paying tuition knowing my parents were both unemployed, but I don't know that it really mattered to my grades. For that matter I don't know that it didn't, it may have. But would it be worth trying to make it sound like it did.

Don't know if I could turn it positive though, it would be more like trying to excuse myself unless somehow I find a way to make it sound like I gained maturity through the experiences.

I was accepted at Drexel post-bach last year and deferred for a year with deposit so I have that. VCU accepted last year as well, but I declined and had to reapply for next year.

Thanks for your thoughts, seems you all feel similar about it to me and it wouldn't be worth trying to explain.

"If this sounds stupid it probably is." - Avital Ronell.
 
Adcoms have heard every single excuse over 9000 times. There is nothing you can say, either truthfully or deceitfully, that they would not have heard or would not see through. I would take the space you've already been offered and be extremely relieved to have it.
 
The best way to show that your past grades do not clearly represent your academic capabilities is to kick ***** in your post-bacc classes. Good luck!
 
Ups and downs? LOL.
 
The best way to show that your past grades do not clearly represent your academic capabilities is to kick ***** in your post-bacc classes. Good luck!

I hope so! Thanks for the encouragement.

Thanks blueshift as well.

I get it. Stick to not making excuses for it and just do my best to prove myself.

Ups and downs? LOL.

?
 
Lack of consistency = no bueno.

There's really no excuse here. Refer to signature and apply DO after your PB. Also, make sure your PB is straight-As. No more of this "3.4-3.3-3.7-3.1" sh**!
 
Lack of consistency? I had one dip in one semester and got back up after it. In the cumulative gpas/year (not /semester) it's an upward trend, but nothing steep.

I took 50 science credits in the freshman and sophomore and 10 non-science.
35 each science and non-science in last two years.

That's hardly inconsistent, the only inconsistency is a BCPM drop of 0.08 between first and second year. Everything else is up. BCPM (3.09 ending 3.58), AO (3.38 second year to 3.93), and cGPA (3.09 to 3.71).
 
Lack of consistency? I had one dip in one semester and got back up after it. In the cumulative gpas/year (not /semester) it's an upward trend, but nothing steep.

I took 50 science credits in the freshman and sophomore and 10 non-science.
35 each science and non-science in last two years.

That's hardly inconsistent, the only inconsistency is a BCPM drop of 0.08 between first and second year. Everything else is up. BCPM (3.09 ending 3.58), AO (3.38 second year to 3.93), and cGPA (3.09 to 3.71).

Here's a summary of your OP:

The first four semesters GPA are roughly: 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 3.1....3.5, 3.5....3.7+, 3.7+, 3.3.


PS AMCAS cgpa 3.4 BCPM 3.22.

Sorry, that's not really an upward trend, nor is it consistent. It starts very low, then low, then average, then low, then low average, low average, high/high average, high/high average, low. An upward trend wouldn't be 3.5s (we should be seeing 3.65+ to show the beginning was just a rough start). The drop at the end to a 3.3 ruins any semblance of a consistent upward trend. With as rough a start as you had at the beginning, you can't really afford any more rough patches. Your cGPA (3.4) and sGPA (3.2) are testaments to that. This isn't to say you can't begin an upward trend now, but it has got to be consistent. Competition is fierce and your 3.4/3.2 puts you a ways behind the curve. We all encounter rough semesters but you sort of used up your allotment of academic grace your first two years of college. Your PB needs to be clearly a cut above everyone else or you'll likely be one of the people coming back a year or two from now complaining how despite your 3.6-3.8 GPA the past 2-4 semesters, no school was willing to take a chance with you. Look around and you'll see that that's not an uncommon scenario at all.

Anyway, good luck. With some consistent effort I definitely think you can do it. It's simply going to take some blood, sweat, and tears on your part!
 
Ok.

That 3.3 at the end was calculated on the AMCAS as part of senior year. Like I said, it was a single course that couldn't be fit into semesters/summers.

Still, I see your point. Like others said: nothing to explain and hopefully do well in PB.
 
Top