- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 18,577
- Reaction score
- 57
Confused about what EK is trying to say here.
F2 is PP, Pp, Pp, pp. P = dominant = purple. p = recessive = white.
It's easy to see that F2 is PP, Pp, Pp, pp from the fact that F1 is all heterozygotes, but how does the F3 generation (what the quote is talking about) show/prove that F2 was half heterozygotes, and half homozygotes?
Also, the bold is talking only about the hybrids, right? Because the PP's express the dominant trait, but since they don't have a p, the recessive is not latent, but not there at all.
F2 is PP, Pp, Pp, pp. P = dominant = purple. p = recessive = white.
When the F2 generation was self-pollinated, 33% of the dominants produced only dominants, and the rest of the dominants produced the Mendelian ratio (3:1). The white flowered plants produced only white flowered plants. Thus, half of the F2 generation expressed the dominant trait with the recessive trait latent
It's easy to see that F2 is PP, Pp, Pp, pp from the fact that F1 is all heterozygotes, but how does the F3 generation (what the quote is talking about) show/prove that F2 was half heterozygotes, and half homozygotes?
Also, the bold is talking only about the hybrids, right? Because the PP's express the dominant trait, but since they don't have a p, the recessive is not latent, but not there at all.
Last edited: