...............
Last edited:
BenignDMD said:Hey guys....I took the DAT saturday afternoon, slept all day yesterday! Here are my scores:
24 QR, 22 PAT, 20 Bio, 23 Gchem, 19 Ochem, 22 RC
Overall, it was not bad at all....I think I overstudied, especially for the Gchem..
The Bio was straightforward, not in detail, very general. Same with the Ochem. I had like 8 reactions, the rest were about bond strngth, nucleophiles, etc...
Reading was'nt bad either. I had the passgaes on the metoers, the brain, and imaging techniques. QR was simple, I couldnt answer one problem, just got stuck on it...Figured it out now thought! Should have gotten it right!
Gchem was a joke. I knew all the formulas and how to solve all the problems, but they werent on the DAT. It was very broad, just theories and rules...
PAT wasnt bad at all either. I thought I did better than 22...I had the most trouble with the pattern folding, but on the DAT it was the easiest section. The angles were actually a lot tougher, very hard to differentiate btw. them. Overall though, I'm satisfied, wish I had done better on Ochem b/c my GPA isnt the best in the world. But, I have a lot fo other things that should round out my application hopefully. Later
BenignDMD said:Hey guys....I took the DAT saturday afternoon, slept all day yesterday! Here are my scores:
24 QR, 22 PAT, 20 Bio, 23 Gchem, 19 Ochem, 22 RC
Overall, it was not bad at all....I think I overstudied, especially for the Gchem..
The Bio was straightforward, not in detail, very general. Same with the Ochem. I had like 8 reactions, the rest were about bond strngth, nucleophiles, etc...
Reading was'nt bad either. I had the passgaes on the metoers, the brain, and imaging techniques. QR was simple, I couldnt answer one problem, just got stuck on it...Figured it out now thought! Should have gotten it right!
Gchem was a joke. I knew all the formulas and how to solve all the problems, but they werent on the DAT. It was very broad, just theories and rules...
PAT wasnt bad at all either. I thought I did better than 22...I had the most trouble with the pattern folding, but on the DAT it was the easiest section. The angles were actually a lot tougher, very hard to differentiate btw. them. Overall though, I'm satisfied, wish I had done better on Ochem b/c my GPA isnt the best in the world. But, I have a lot fo other things that should round out my application hopefully. Later
BenignDMD said:Hey guys....I took the DAT saturday afternoon, slept all day yesterday! Here are my scores:
24 QR, 22 PAT, 20 Bio, 23 Gchem, 19 Ochem, 22 RC
Overall, it was not bad at all....I think I overstudied, especially for the Gchem..
The Bio was straightforward, not in detail, very general. Same with the Ochem. I had like 8 reactions, the rest were about bond strngth, nucleophiles, etc...
Reading was'nt bad either. I had the passgaes on the metoers, the brain, and imaging techniques. QR was simple, I couldnt answer one problem, just got stuck on it...Figured it out now thought! Should have gotten it right!
Gchem was a joke. I knew all the formulas and how to solve all the problems, but they werent on the DAT. It was very broad, just theories and rules...
PAT wasnt bad at all either. I thought I did better than 22...I had the most trouble with the pattern folding, but on the DAT it was the easiest section. The angles were actually a lot tougher, very hard to differentiate btw. them. Overall though, I'm satisfied, wish I had done better on Ochem b/c my GPA isnt the best in the world. But, I have a lot fo other things that should round out my application hopefully. Later
BenignDMD said:Thanks! Yea, I'd rather stay in Houston iff possible. I have a condo down here in the med center, and having to move would be a hassle. I have Houston as 1 and Dallas as 2, SA 3...I dont want to move to San Antonio!!! My GPA is a concern though. I didnt do so hot for three years until I was diagnosed with adult ADD. Very weird since I had a 4.0 in high school, but I guess once the workload increased the symptoms started to show. Since then though, GPA has been real good, hopefully I can get an interview so I can explain to the admissions ppl face to face...
BenignDMD said:Hey guys....I took the DAT saturday afternoon, slept all day yesterday! Here are my scores:
24 QR, 22 PAT, 20 Bio, 23 Gchem, 19 Ochem, 22 RC
Overall, it was not bad at all....I think I overstudied, especially for the Gchem..
The Bio was straightforward, not in detail, very general. Same with the Ochem. I had like 8 reactions, the rest were about bond strngth, nucleophiles, etc...
Reading was'nt bad either. I had the passgaes on the metoers, the brain, and imaging techniques. QR was simple, I couldnt answer one problem, just got stuck on it...Figured it out now thought! Should have gotten it right!
Gchem was a joke. I knew all the formulas and how to solve all the problems, but they werent on the DAT. It was very broad, just theories and rules...
PAT wasnt bad at all either. I thought I did better than 22...I had the most trouble with the pattern folding, but on the DAT it was the easiest section. The angles were actually a lot tougher, very hard to differentiate btw. them. Overall though, I'm satisfied, wish I had done better on Ochem b/c my GPA isnt the best in the world. But, I have a lot fo other things that should round out my application hopefully. Later