Fishman, Fine, & Webster...

[101N]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Making us all proud: http://freepdfhosting.com/6da1610988.pdf

 

[SeniorWrangler]

Pretty interesting reading. I wonder who their consultant is?

 

[ampaphb]

.

 

[drusso]

Pretty interesting reading. I wonder who their consultant is?

Do you think that there is tainting by PROP?

 

[drusso]

Pretty interesting reading. I wonder who their consultant is?

Roger Chou was lead author on the controversial and deceptive guidelines published in 2009 referenced in paragraphs 117 and 118 of the complaint, but he was not named in complaint. I wonder if he was paid to the work or received any compensation whatsoever for his efforts?

http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(08)00831-6/abstract

 

[101N]

I'd be cautious about slandering either Dr. Chou or PROP in a public forum.

 

[drusso]

I'd be cautious about slandering either Dr. Chou or PROP in a public forum.

When there is controversy, everyone has a responsibility to hold public figures and state employees accountable. No one should shirk that.

 

[lonelobo]

Screw Chou

 

[ampaphb]

I'd be cautious about slandering either Dr. Chou or PROP in a public forum.

Saying something true (even if it is mean) is not slander.

Writing something true (even if it is mean) is not libel.

I'd be cautious to try and not use legal terms of art when you are not sufficiently informed to recognize that there is such a definitional distinction.