- Joined
- Mar 1, 2010
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
As the title suggests, this topic is about the somewhat fixed salary of a pharmacist and compares it to the variable salary of a physician. I've taken a look at the similar threads, so I'm not posting this uninformed. I just want to see other people's two cents on this specific matter.
According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook, it says that the median annual wage of a pharmacist in 2008 was $106,410 and the middle 50% earned between $92,670 and $121,310 a year. Conversely, a physician's compensation varies by his/her type of practice. In 2008, physicians practicing primary care had total median annual compensation of $186,044, and physicians practicing in medical specialties earned a total median annual compensation of $339,738.
Now I only look to money in order to provide for the family. It seems that although pharmacists have flexibility in their job, the increase in salary they can earn from the base is not that much compared to that a physician can make, although a physician's variable wage can change with the recent health care reform. In other words, if a pharmacist wanted to step it up in their life, whether it be with a bigger house or more children, the amount they could be making may not necessarily accommodate the lifestyle change. The more kids one has, assuming that the wife would stay home to take care of the children, this would make the pharmacist the sole bread-winner of the family, meaning it would be harder to provide for the family with the restricted salary range.
On the other hand, while a physician may be able to provide better for a growing family or changing lifestyle through his/her higher salary, he/she would have to work for long stressful hours, barely being able to spend quality time with the family. To me, it's important to spend such time with the children because it is essential to how they grow up and is something that money cannot provide for. In today's society, it seems that physicians have to work longer hours and even have to take their work home to be able to make the same amount they were making before.
So what do you guys think about this? Also, with the new health care reform, where do you see the physician's fate headed in terms of salary, workload, and lifestyle with the family?
According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook, it says that the median annual wage of a pharmacist in 2008 was $106,410 and the middle 50% earned between $92,670 and $121,310 a year. Conversely, a physician's compensation varies by his/her type of practice. In 2008, physicians practicing primary care had total median annual compensation of $186,044, and physicians practicing in medical specialties earned a total median annual compensation of $339,738.
Now I only look to money in order to provide for the family. It seems that although pharmacists have flexibility in their job, the increase in salary they can earn from the base is not that much compared to that a physician can make, although a physician's variable wage can change with the recent health care reform. In other words, if a pharmacist wanted to step it up in their life, whether it be with a bigger house or more children, the amount they could be making may not necessarily accommodate the lifestyle change. The more kids one has, assuming that the wife would stay home to take care of the children, this would make the pharmacist the sole bread-winner of the family, meaning it would be harder to provide for the family with the restricted salary range.
On the other hand, while a physician may be able to provide better for a growing family or changing lifestyle through his/her higher salary, he/she would have to work for long stressful hours, barely being able to spend quality time with the family. To me, it's important to spend such time with the children because it is essential to how they grow up and is something that money cannot provide for. In today's society, it seems that physicians have to work longer hours and even have to take their work home to be able to make the same amount they were making before.
So what do you guys think about this? Also, with the new health care reform, where do you see the physician's fate headed in terms of salary, workload, and lifestyle with the family?