- Joined
- Mar 12, 2015
- Messages
- 457
- Reaction score
- 417
I thought I’d share so that anyone interested can get an idea of what previous DO applicants brought to the table based on the data that’s available for the past 4 years. This is specifically looking at osteopathic seniors - not the entire pool of applicants.
Quick summary:
2014 - 4 applicants, no matches
2015 - 1 applicant, 1 match
2016 - no applicants
2017 - 2 applicants, 1 match, 1 unmatched
2018 - 4 applicants, 2 matched, 2 unmatched
Similar amongst all matched: 240+ Step 1, 240+ Step 2, at least 1 publication, at least 1 conference/poster presentation, at least 5 volunteering activties reported.
Except for 1 outlier in 2014, the unmatched applicants had the same issues of having very weak research experience. Connections and network likely played a significant role in helping the successful matches, but the matched applicants definitely had the academic profiles to pull their own weight.

Quick summary:
2014 - 4 applicants, no matches
2015 - 1 applicant, 1 match
2016 - no applicants
2017 - 2 applicants, 1 match, 1 unmatched
2018 - 4 applicants, 2 matched, 2 unmatched
Similar amongst all matched: 240+ Step 1, 240+ Step 2, at least 1 publication, at least 1 conference/poster presentation, at least 5 volunteering activties reported.
Except for 1 outlier in 2014, the unmatched applicants had the same issues of having very weak research experience. Connections and network likely played a significant role in helping the successful matches, but the matched applicants definitely had the academic profiles to pull their own weight.



