Honestly, I am not sure what the fuss is about this guy. His input is very useful--even if he wants to make money off of it by trademarking the term "MIA," etc. It is obvious that when you do anesthetics outside the hospital that the risks are greater, and, as Friedberg stated in the CSA bulletin from 2003, the expectations are greater.
The public doesn't have a great understanding of what's going on when they're being anesthetized. The fact that they get discharged from breast implantation and the like the same day adds to the perception that we're just doing something simple, something that should NEVER result in a serious negative outcome. Knowing that this is the case, I'm glad that Friedberg published his book as it gives valuable insights into this area of anesthesia.
Overall, it shouldn't matter if Friedberg wants to maximize his profits doing what he does. Patients already refer to themselves as our "clients" and doctor-shop left and right before they settle on a physician. Times have changed--why shouldn't we with them?
The public doesn't have a great understanding of what's going on when they're being anesthetized. The fact that they get discharged from breast implantation and the like the same day adds to the perception that we're just doing something simple, something that should NEVER result in a serious negative outcome. Knowing that this is the case, I'm glad that Friedberg published his book as it gives valuable insights into this area of anesthesia.
Overall, it shouldn't matter if Friedberg wants to maximize his profits doing what he does. Patients already refer to themselves as our "clients" and doctor-shop left and right before they settle on a physician. Times have changed--why shouldn't we with them?