From the perspective of the MD school, how does the admission process work??

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

undergrad13

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
141
Reaction score
4
As an applicant you would submit an application of all required documents and such to the the AMCAS and the school you apply to will get your application. Once they receive it, how does it all go down???
who is in the committee? how do they look over each application, wouldn't it all be subjective?? what role does the dean/director of admissions have? can he/she admit a student they want (children of rich donors to the school/ or students they really like on the application).
I know that this information is not a big deal but it wouldn't hurt to know how it all works, i'm quite curious.

Members don't see this ad.
 
OgaFtP.jpg
 
Members don't see this ad :)
As an applicant you would submit an application of all required documents and such to the the AMCAS and the school you apply to will get your application. Once they receive it, how does it all go down???
who is in the committee? how do they look over each application, wouldn't it all be subjective?? what role does the dean/director of admissions have? can he/she admit a student they want (children of rich donors to the school/ or students they really like on the application).
I know that this information is not a big deal but it wouldn't hurt to know how it all works, i'm quite curious.

Every school is going to do it a bit differently but basically, it goes like this:

  • Application including secondary and letters of recommendation (LORs) are received.
  • Application is screened for basics like state residence (if that matters -- it is important to some schools), GPA, MCAT (e.g. you aren't getting in with a 2.1, 480 regardless of who you know).
  • Application is passed along to one or more reviewers. Reviewers use a rubric to score the application after reviewing essays, experience, LORs. They may also write comments including requests that certain things be asked during the interview. This is not going to be subjective because there is a rubric. If there are two reviewers, inter-rater reliability can be determined and unreliable raters can be retrained. The reviewers may be faculty, staff, alumni, and/or students.
  • Person(s) tasked with selecting applicants for interview based on reviews make(s) interview invites. This could be the Dean of Admissions or a team effort.
  • Applicant is interviewed and Interviewer(s) write report(s) The interviewers may be faculty, staff, alumni, and/or students.
  • Group members review the original application, the application review/rubric, interviewers' reports and score the applicants. This group may or may not include application reviewers and interviewers. Discussion follows, particularly if the scores assigned by group members include outliers.
  • Based on average of group member scores, Adcom members make decisions about offers, waitlist, reject. The Adcom (Admissions Committee) must be comprised of faculty of the medical school. (Accreditation requirement)
The Dean or Director of Admissions is responsible for developing policies and rubrics, recruiting and training group members, reviewers and interviewers, serving as the public face of the admission committee and sitting on the Dean's Council. The Dean might take an active role in recruiting applicants, particularly during the interview day, may be the decision maker regarding interview invites, may have decision-making role in chosing applicants from the waitlist.

The Dean of Admissions cannot unilaterally admit an applicant. The Dean is going to have to answer to someone if an unqualified applicant is admitted and then does poorly so an expectation that a VIP's kid will be admitted because the Dean wants to do that is mostly fantasy.
 
Last edited:
  • Application is passed along to one or more reviewers. Reviewers use a rubric to score the application after reviewing essays, experience, LORs. They may also write comments including requests that certain things be asked during the interview. This is not going to be subjective because there is a rubric. If there are two reviewers, inter-rater reliability can be determined and unreliable raters can be retrained. The reviewers may be faculty, staff, alumni, and/or students.
Would you say this is the most important step in the process? How 2-3 reviewers view your application, and rest of the team (including the Dean) goes off of II or not based on these comments? This to me is similar to writing a committee letter for an applicant.
 
Would you say this is the most important step in the process? How 2-3 reviewers view your application, and rest of the team (including the Dean) goes off of II or not based on these comments? This to me is similar to writing a committee letter for an applicant.

You can't get in without a good interview and you can't even get an interview unless the reviewer(s) say you should be interviewed. But you don't even get to that point if you can't pass the initial screen. It is a mountain and you climb it one step at a time.
 
Every school is going to do it a bit differently but basically, it goes like this:

  • Application including secondary and letters of recommendation (LORs) are received.
  • Application is screened for basics like state residence (if that matters -- it is important to some schools), GPA, MCAT (e.g. you aren't getting in with a 2.1, 480 regardless of who you know).
  • Application is passed along to one or more reviewers. Reviewers use a rubric to score the application after reviewing essays, experience, LORs. They may also write comments including requests that certain things be asked during the interview. This is not going to be subjective because there is a rubric. If there are two reviewers, inter-rater reliability can be determined and unreliable raters can be retrained. The reviewers may be faculty, staff, alumni, and/or students.
  • Person(s) tasked with selecting applicants for interview based on reviews make(s) interview invites. This could be the Dean of Admissions or a team effort.
  • Applicant is interviewed and Interviewer(s) write report(s) The interviewers may be faculty, staff, alumni, and/or students.
  • Group members review the original application, the application review/rubric, interviewers' reports and score the applicants. This group may or may not include application reviewers and interviewers. Discussion follows, particularly if the scores assigned by group members include outliers.
  • Based on average of group member scores, Adcom members make decisions about offers, waitlist, reject. The Adcom (Admissions Committee) must be comprised of faculty of the medical school. (Accreditation requirement)
The Dean or Director of Admissions is responsible for developing policies and rubrics, recruiting and training group members, reviewers and interviewers, serving as the public face of the admission committee and sitting on the Dean's Council. The Dean might take an active role in recruiting applicants, particularly during the interview day, may be the decision maker regarding interview invites, may have decision-making role in chosing applicants from the waitlist.

The Dean of Admissions cannot unilaterally admit an applicant. The Dean is going to have to answer to someone if an unqualified applicant is admitted and then does poorly so an expectation that a VIP's kid will be admitted because the Dean wants to do that is mostly fantasy.
This was really informative. I really appreciate it.
Thanks
 
As an applicant you would submit an application of all required documents and such to the the AMCAS and the school you apply to will get your application. Once they receive it, how does it all go down???
who is in the committee? how do they look over each application, wouldn't it all be subjective?? what role does the dean/director of admissions have? can he/she admit a student they want (children of rich donors to the school/ or students they really like on the application).
I know that this information is not a big deal but it wouldn't hurt to know how it all works, i'm quite curious.
See also:

https://www.utrgv.edu/som/admissions/_files/documents/flowchart-application-process.pdf

Goro's Guide to Interviews: The View from Behind the Curtain
 
Top