- Joined
- May 7, 2003
- Messages
- 1,519
- Reaction score
- 25
A classmate just asked an awesome question, which points out one of those things that seems easy but then gets complicated when you think about it.
What we call an "AP view" of the chest is actually an AP projection; the beam goes from front to back, and that's where the cartridge is. No problems there. But we really shouldn't call it an AP view.
The thing is (and this was the basis of the question), if you think about the completed image as a window, if you read that beam's information back, it's like you're standing behind the patient.
The image is two-dimensional, but to point out why this is confusing, imagine it's a thin prism, like a 1cm-thick rectangle of gel. We put the spine closest to the film because that's what we care about, and therefore we want to put the spine closest to us when we read it. So it seems backwards to call it an AP "view." We're not viewing it that way at all.
The real answer, I think, is to remember the image really is two-dimensional, and flip it over on the light-box, and stop worrying. But it caused us some head-scratching. Silly students.
What else can you think of that seems simple... until you try to explain it to someone new?
What we call an "AP view" of the chest is actually an AP projection; the beam goes from front to back, and that's where the cartridge is. No problems there. But we really shouldn't call it an AP view.
The thing is (and this was the basis of the question), if you think about the completed image as a window, if you read that beam's information back, it's like you're standing behind the patient.
The image is two-dimensional, but to point out why this is confusing, imagine it's a thin prism, like a 1cm-thick rectangle of gel. We put the spine closest to the film because that's what we care about, and therefore we want to put the spine closest to us when we read it. So it seems backwards to call it an AP "view." We're not viewing it that way at all.
The real answer, I think, is to remember the image really is two-dimensional, and flip it over on the light-box, and stop worrying. But it caused us some head-scratching. Silly students.
What else can you think of that seems simple... until you try to explain it to someone new?