Future of neurology

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

unhappytnt

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
6
Pre-med here. I probably won't get much love for asking this but here it goes:

Since it will be a while before I enter practice, what do you think the field of neurology look like in the next 10-20 years? I know that's way into the future and most answers will be speculative, but I just want to know what the neurology residents and attendings think about it. What sort of new diagnosis methods and treatments will neurologist most likely employ in the future? Also, I read the demand for neurologists will go up. Any truth in that?

(I searched the forums for future of neurology and the latest post was from 2005. 😀)
 
I have no idea what the field of neurology will look like in the next two years let alone 10-20. But I read this paper that was an absolutely amazing advancement. They were able to insert a gene into a mouses brain, via virus, that changed sodium and chloride channels. It made them light sensitive. They had a flashlight in the mouses cranium and when they shined a yellow light the certain neurons in a section of brain turned on. When they turned the blue light on the neurons turned off. So they were able to see how the mouse acted without this certain part of its brain. It was wicked cool. These kind of procedures are going make great strides in neurology.
 
I am a current neurology resident, and here are my predictions for the changes which will ocurr in neurology in my career.

1) There will be newer and more effective treatments for neuroimmunological diseases. Diseases such as autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathy, multiple sclerosis, and myasthenia will be categorized, subcategorized, and studied extensively. New monoclonal antibody infusion treatments will have specific targets for maximal efficacy with less side effects. The prognosis of "malignant" multiple sclerosis may improve somewhat, although some cases will still be resistant.

There may an increase in the early diagnosis of benign multiple sclerosis and unnecessary aggressive treatment in these patients could be an unfortunate side effect.

2)

The treatment of acute stroke will go the way of cardiology, and tissue plasminogen activator and thrombectomy will become commonplace even at non-academic centers. Current multimodal MRI techniques for determining which patients will benefit from intervention will prove unreliable, but doctors will continue to treat acute stroke very aggressively with a modest clinical benefit and an astronomically increased cost.

3) Advances in neuroimaging will assist in the diagnosis of neurological disorders in ways that I am unable to predict. New forms of functional neuroimaging or spectroscopy may play a role.

4) neurointerventional radiology will continue to grow, and intraarterial procedures will be performed where neurosurgical proceedures were previously performed. Perhaps even brain biopsy will be performed via catheter based proceedures.

5) The number of drugs used to treat migraine will increase tremendously without clinical benefit

6) The treatment of partial onset epilepsy with surgery/radioablation will increase in frequency along with the use of magnetoencephalography

7) Intraoperative monitoring will continue to grow and may gain a role in acute stroke.

8) We will continue to see advancements in the understanding of neurdegenerative and genetic disorders, and many etiologies will be defined explicitly. Clinical entities previously thought to be homogeneous will be broken down into distinct categories. Most of these conditions will remain without highly effective treatments, although a smaller number of metabolic conditions will become highly treatable. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling will become commonplace. Specifically, I suspect that several decades from now, gene chip microarray analysis for a myriad of common and uncommon human diseases will be done routinely.

9) For the most part, there will be no highly effective treatments for the most common forms of dementia

10) New chemotherapy regimens will significantly improve the prognosis of certain brain cancers with a previously poor prognosis such as high grade glioma. Open surgical debulking/resection may even become unnecessary.

11) In general, neurologists in particular and physicians in general will in many cases fail to meet the ridiculously high expectations of patients.
 
I am a current neurology resident, and here are my predictions for the changes which will ocurr in neurology in my career.

1) There will be newer and more effective treatments for neuroimmunological diseases. Diseases such as autoimmune demyelinating polyneuropathy, multiple sclerosis, and myasthenia will be categorized, subcategorized, and studied extensively. New monoclonal antibody infusion treatments will have specific targets for maximal efficacy with less side effects. The prognosis of "malignant" multiple sclerosis may improve somewhat, although some cases will still be resistant.

There may an increase in the early diagnosis of benign multiple sclerosis and unnecessary aggressive treatment in these patients could be an unfortunate side effect.

2)

The treatment of acute stroke will go the way of cardiology, and tissue plasminogen activator and thrombectomy will become commonplace even at non-academic centers. Current multimodal MRI techniques for determining which patients will benefit from intervention will prove unreliable, but doctors will continue to treat acute stroke very aggressively with a modest clinical benefit and an astronomically increased cost.

3) Advances in neuroimaging will assist in the diagnosis of neurological disorders in ways that I am unable to predict. New forms of functional neuroimaging or spectroscopy may play a role.

4) neurointerventional radiology will continue to grow, and intraarterial procedures will be performed where neurosurgical proceedures were previously performed. Perhaps even brain biopsy will be performed via catheter based proceedures.

5) The number of drugs used to treat migraine will increase tremendously without clinical benefit

6) The treatment of partial onset epilepsy with surgery/radioablation will increase in frequency along with the use of magnetoencephalography

7) Intraoperative monitoring will continue to grow and may gain a role in acute stroke.

8) We will continue to see advancements in the understanding of neurdegenerative and genetic disorders, and many etiologies will be defined explicitly. Clinical entities previously thought to be homogeneous will be broken down into distinct categories. Most of these conditions will remain without highly effective treatments, although a smaller number of metabolic conditions will become highly treatable. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling will become commonplace. Specifically, I suspect that several decades from now, gene chip microarray analysis for a myriad of common and uncommon human diseases will be done routinely.

9) For the most part, there will be no highly effective treatments for the most common forms of dementia

10) New chemotherapy regimens will significantly improve the prognosis of certain brain cancers with a previously poor prognosis such as high grade glioma. Open surgical debulking/resection may even become unnecessary.

11) In general, neurologists in particular and physicians in general will in many cases fail to meet the ridiculously high expectations of patients.

Thank you soulofmpatel. Even though half of the terms in there are French to me, it's still teally insightful. 😀👍
 
11) In general, neurologists in particular and physicians in general will in many cases fail to meet the ridiculously high expectations of patients.

I literally LOL'ed.. came in to be a smart ass and see you've beaten me to it.

Anyway I wanted to add that americans will continue to turn themselves into sour patch kids by not controlling their diabetes, therefore we will continue to see an increase in stroke and neuropathy.

Seriously though, I think we're going to see a lot better organization of information on the nervous system based on objective pathology and less on heterogeneous clincal diagnoses [Autistic spectrum disorder and other psych stuff, multiple sclerosis subtypes, etc]. This will be possible because now we can get these while the patient is alive without killing them...people tend to more readily give up a chunk of skin for diagnosis than a chunk of brain, you'll learn that. The amount of data we are about to discover about the working nervous system is staggering, considering what we got from dead brains.
 
Top