- Joined
- May 23, 2008
- Messages
- 62
- Reaction score
- 0
its a long time since i've reviewed sound waves, but i figured i'd start by asking some questions with a stream-of-consiousness technique (forgive my blabber for that reason):
if someone wears a helmet and an alarm goes off, but he is not moving relative to source of sound, does the helmet wearer perceive a reduced velocity, frequency or wavelength or none? i remember reading that we are not sensitive to wavelength - only frequency - so maybe not wavelength; the only way frequency can change is through the doppler effect (someone correct me on this if im wrong), and if wavelength and freq do not change, neither will the velocity of the sound wave. but sound travels quicker in a helmet rather than air! at the same time, there is a gap of air between the helmet and our ears, so velocity should not change. so basically nothing changes and the person will hear the sound as if he is not wearing a helmet.
i hope my reasoning is correct, but if it is not, please let me know! thanks in advance!
if someone wears a helmet and an alarm goes off, but he is not moving relative to source of sound, does the helmet wearer perceive a reduced velocity, frequency or wavelength or none? i remember reading that we are not sensitive to wavelength - only frequency - so maybe not wavelength; the only way frequency can change is through the doppler effect (someone correct me on this if im wrong), and if wavelength and freq do not change, neither will the velocity of the sound wave. but sound travels quicker in a helmet rather than air! at the same time, there is a gap of air between the helmet and our ears, so velocity should not change. so basically nothing changes and the person will hear the sound as if he is not wearing a helmet.
i hope my reasoning is correct, but if it is not, please let me know! thanks in advance!