Halides weak or strong nucleophiles?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dentalwhiz

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
90
Reaction score
16
Im studying for the DAT and have come across conflicting notes. Mike Christensen from DBC states that halogens* are weak nucleophiles and undergo SN1 rxns; my notes from school say that halogens* are strong nucleophiles, but weak bases and undergo SN2 rxns. I searched online and can't really find a straightforward answer, any clarification would be greatly appreciated

Edit: DBC also says RCOO- groups are weak nucleophiles due to resonance delocalization and undergo SN1 runs. My notes say that RCOO- is a strong nucleophile/weak base and do SN2...
 
Last edited:
From what I have learned, if you have something like HBr, it will participate in SN1, but if you have the salt, like NaBr (which would separate to Na+ and Br-), then you would do SN2. For halogen exchange in SN2, just make sure that your leaving group is not a better nucleophile (for example, F- can replace Br-, but not vice versa)
 
Im not sure if your familiar with his work, but on his quiz (8.1) the first question he reacts a secondary carbon w/ an Li-I compound and he states its SN1, and his reasoning only includes that halogens are an exception. Any insight on this?
 
If someone could please give an explanation for this... I thought i would breeze through this section, but these conflicting notes are holding me back big time right now
 
Im studying for the DAT and have come across conflicting notes. Mike Christensen from DBC states that halogens* are weak nucleophiles and undergo SN1 rxns; my notes from school say that halogens* are strong nucleophiles, but weak bases and undergo SN2 rxns. I searched online and can't really find a straightforward answer, any clarification would be greatly appreciated

Edit: DBC also says RCOO- groups are weak nucleophiles due to resonance delocalization and undergo SN1 runs. My notes say that RCOO- is a strong nucleophile/weak base and do SN2...
Let me settle this......Halogens such as I- are EXCELLENT reactions when used in a polar protic solvent. The order of reactivity will be I- >Br->Cl> F-. As you can see Iodine is best. Fluorine is the worst because the polar solvent solvates the ion and renders this nucleophile useless since it is captured in a hydrogen bonded molecular solvent cage. Now....let's change the solvent to polar aprotic such as HMPT, DMSO, THF, or acetone. We now see the order is reversed ! F- > Cl- >Br->I-. Hopefully you see that F- will be a very good nucleophile. Through the many years I have been doing organic synthesis, I always was able to install an Fluorine onto a compound via an SN2 reaction using NaF in a solvent such as DMSO. For your other question, your notes are correct. Acetate ion is a fairly good nucleophile and prefers to do the SN2 reaction mechanism. I have a few challenging DESTROYER questions on nucleophilicity that I hope you will enjoy.

I hope this helps.

Dr. Romano
 
Top