- Joined
- Jun 13, 2014
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 3
i could go to Belize for this.
If you genuinely care about a certain population somewhere in the world, then by all means do it. If you're looking to pad your medical school application and think that this will look great to ADCOMs, it won't. They will tell you repeatedly that these short commitments are meaningless, and might even make your application look worse if you make it the centerpiece. If you're looking for an excuse to go on an exotic vacation, then spend the money you would have spent on this trip to go to an even more exotic and fun place than Belize. You'll have more fun that way.
I'd really like to hear about that from @Goro or @LizzyM or any other ADCOM member. Regardless of meaning, I think I would be safe to say that calling an overseas volunteering experience a "meaningless" venture is absurd. Being part of a global health org, there is significant proof that these commitments have purpose. It's up to the organization to make the experience worthwhile, not the individual. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your point? In any case, I feel like these commitments at least show concern for others. I doubt anyone is going to invest $1500+ just to butter up their med school resume but what do I know... I didn't come from a life of luxury.
I'd really like to hear about that from @Goro or @LizzyM or any other ADCOM member. Regardless of meaning, I think I would be safe to say that calling an overseas volunteering experience a "meaningless" venture is absurd. Being part of a global health org, there is significant proof that these commitments have purpose. It's up to the organization to make the experience worthwhile, not the individual. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your point? In any case, I feel like these commitments at least show concern for others. I doubt anyone is going to invest $1500+ just to butter up their med school resume but what do I know... I didn't come from a life of luxury.
Also, if you truly did care about these populations, why not donate your $1500+ plane ticket to that population, so that a real doctor with actual skills can be hired.
I don't know. I see your point in terms of the monetary investment, but what a donation doesn't do is build an internal drive to make change. Granted, this may only happen to some, it is still possible. If evidenced through the application of personal change, I don't see a problem. Maybe this is taboo to say, but I truly feel a medical mission trip or even a non-medical mission trip (my experience) is more than some vacation with an added bonus of doctor shadowing. Personally, I was changed through my trip and I will always be a strong proponent of doing it at least once. My entire personal statement, without giving too much detail, stemmed from my experience. Like I've said in another post, I'm not going to alter myself to accomodate an ADCOM member.
i could go to Belize for this.
Unless you can produce an LOR from a preceptor or supervisor about what you did on the trip, Adcoms view these as "medical tourism" at best, or a backhanded way of taking a vacation and calling "medical mission" at the worst.
Merely going to a 3rd World country and seeing how bad people live there, and calling it an epiphany, reeks of privilege and shortsightedness, unless you subsequently did something to back up your change of heart, like found a successful charity, or join the Peace Corps.
DokterMom gets it.
If you want to make an impression on AdComs, go to the poorest of the poor section of the US (or your own city) and volunteer there. Removing the glamor of an international trip brings your altruism to the forefront and provides most of the experiences of a different culture with none of the 'medical vacation taint'.
Think I shouldn't even mention my experience Goro? I don't know if I had an epiphany, but it certainly made me more sure of my decision to go into primary care. I certainly don't want to come across as you described though...
Unless you can produce an LOR from a preceptor or supervisor about what you did on the trip, Adcoms view these as "medical tourism" at best, or a backhanded way of taking a vacation and calling "medical mission" at the worst.
Merely going to a 3rd World country and seeing how bad people live there, and calling it an epiphany, reeks of privilege and shortsightedness, unless you subsequently did something to back up your change of heart, like found a successful charity, or join the Peace Corps.
DokterMom gets it.
If you want to make an impression on AdComs, go to the poorest of the poor section of the US (or your own city) and volunteer there. Removing the glamor of an international trip brings your altruism to the forefront and provides most of the experiences of a different culture with none of the 'medical vacation taint'.
I can't stand this. There are so many people at my University that do these "Medical Mission Trips" to poor countries and act like they had a "life changing experience".
.
I know someone who did one of these trips and was accepted to multiple medical schools. He told me that at the interviews, the schools seemed most interested in this particular experience. All schools are different though and it depends on how you spin it and what you make of it. Honestly, these experiences get so much hate on SDN and I don't understand why. They are clinical experiences with a unique community. There's a lot to learn there. People act like if you go overseas to do clinical work instead of doing it in America, you suddenly become a "box-checking, ruthless, heartless, insincere, pre-med gunner"
They've already given their input in the past. Unless it's for an extended period of time, it's not going to be a huge plus on your application.
So many premeds do these sort of medical "tourism" trips that it won't make you stand out at all. In fact, some concerns have been brought up in the past regarding premeds looking for ways to get more "hands on experience" with these sort of trips, which has potential to be medically unethical. Also, if you truly did care about these populations, why not donate your $1500+ plane ticket to that population, so that a real doctor with actual skills can be hired. A premed without any skills won't make much of a difference in 2-3 weeks passing out blankets and band-aids.
I know someone who did one of these trips and was accepted to multiple medical schools. He told me that at the interviews, the schools seemed most interested in this particular experience. All schools are different though and it depends on how you spin it and what you make of it. Honestly, these experiences get so much hate on SDN and I don't understand why. They are clinical experiences with a unique community. There's a lot to learn there. People act like if you go overseas to do clinical work instead of doing it in America, you suddenly become a "box-checking, ruthless, heartless, insincere, pre-med gunner"
$1500 donated to that population might hurt even worse, since you're paying for stuff they'll get for free which depresses the local economy and increases a reliance on foreign aid. Going there and being a tourist helps their economy in an organic way. Going to these places might not help people, but it will change the perspectives of those who go there.
My take is this: if you're paying 4 figures to be taken on some trip to hand out supplies and play with little kids, it's kind of meaningless and potentially counterproductive. However, if you find yourself overseas and are able to do something to benefit an organization, the people, etc. why not? Would also like to hear what @Goro has to say here too.
Case in point, I was on a 2.5 month trip across Asia last year. I had a friend in Myanmar whom I had met previously, whose family runs a series of health clinics across the country. He was able to hook me up with a organization (by organization, I mean a good samaritan and a few assistants) who drove around Yangon and the surrounding areas handing out medical supplies, transporting people to clinics/hospitals, and all around making sure people got what they needed. I road with this guy for two full weeks, handing out supplies, taking people to clinics, and generally providing a source of entertainment when they'd see a white guy stroll into their homes. While I don't think my presence and/or assistance made a huge difference, I do think seeing first hand what life is like for the poorest of the poor made a profound impact on me. These people had such inaccessibility to care, it was unbelievable...if or when I become a doctor I absolutely want to work with an organization like doctors without borders or spend some time each year in a country like Myanmar helping the local population.
So from this standpoint, I didn't pay a dime to do this, and although my short-term involvement probably didnt do a ton, it opened my eyes and helped create one more future doctor sympathetic to the plight of people like those I met. This, I would say is the big takeaway.
Well I was in Asia for 2.5 months but while there I volunteered over a 2 week stint. I guess my point was it wasn't planned and I didn't pay to do it. I just did it because I was there and I wanted to. I think there's a difference between shelling out thousands to do something and what i did.Donating $1500 to pay for a bunch of free medical supplies and giving them to random people there is different from donating $1500 to a local clinic there so that they could hire more staff and/or pay for more/newer equipment.
I'm purely differentiating between 2-3 week medical tourism and longer trips, like yours. You could probably do a bit more in 2.5 months. I can't imagine doing that much in a few weeks.
By "internal drive" I'm pretty sure they were referring to the student's internal drive, ie a new desire/drive to serve others globally. I personally agree. If you think you may want to work in global health, the only way to find out is to try it, and many people (including myself) have seriously adjusted their priorities and goals after experiences like these.Build an internal drive to make change?!
The countries that these medical mission trips are targeting will be less likely to change themselves, internally, because medical missions have the dangerous potential to build a "foreign-dependent" attitude. LizzyM posted a really insightful thesis about the criticisms of medical brigades in Honduras in that thread that Planes2Doc linked. You should read it: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/8620/1/Bradke.pdf