Hearing loss, Rinne & Weber

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drc87

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

These concepts must sound very elementary to y'all but I have tried to learn it so many times and still struggle with it. Can anyone give me tips in answering questions that ask what will weber or rinne test show?😳

Members don't see this ad.
 
Hi guys!

These concepts must sound very elementary to y'all but I have tried to learn it so many times and still struggle with it. Can anyone give me tips in answering questions that ask what will weber or rinne test show?😳

1) Stick a finger in your ear and hum. What side do you hear the hum more loudly? Why? Because the finger in one ear is more dense than the air in the other. Sound travels better through something denser.

If you have crap in your ear, sounds will be louder in the ear with crap in it. That's what Weber's test determines--if an ear has crap in it (i.e. if the ear has conductive hearing loss). Therefore, the side that's loudest must have either have conductive hearing loss (because it has crap in it) or it must be working better than the other ear. How could it be working better than the other ear? Because the other ear has sensorineural hearing loss.

That's why Weber's localizes towards the side with conductive hearing loss and away from the side with sensorineural hearing loss.

2) The whole point of the conducting portion of your ear (everything but the nerves) is to let you better hear sound through air (because, as you know from above, air is generally a poor conductor of sound). So, if everything is working like it should with your conductive pathway, sound transmitted by air ("air conduction") should be heard better than sound transmitted through bone ("bone conduction"), unless there's something wrong with the conducting portion of your ear.

Therefore, if you ever find that bone conduction is greater than air conduction--the opposite of normal--you know something's wrong with the conducting pathway, i.e. there's conductive hearing loss. On the other hand, if air conduction were greater than bone conduction, but the patient still had hearing loss, than you know the problem must be sensorineural. That's Rinne's test.

I hope this helps! It's not quick and easy, but hopefully it better explains the concepts behind the tests.
 
  • Weber test lateralizes the ear with the abnormality

a vibrating tuning fork is put on the vertex and the sound heard is compared in both ears ....

Normally one should hear equally in both ears ... but if one ear has a conduction defect ... the sound heard will louder on that ear ....

if a sensineural lesion is present ... the person will hear louder in the opposite ear

  • now for the Rinnes test ...

it is to distinguish whether the defect is a conduction or sensineural defect ...

a tuning fork is first put on the mastoid process on the affected ear ... and it's put there until the person hears no sound ... then the tuning fork is placed infront of the ear to see if the patient can still hear the sound or not ....

normally bone conduction is slower than the air ...so the person will normally hear the sound when the tuning fork is placed infront of the ear after being put on the mastoid process ...

but if there is a conduction defect ....the person will not hear the sound when placed infront of the ear ...BC>AC

and if there is a sensineual defect ...the person will not hear or hear the same intensity(partial loss) irrespective of the place where the tuning fork is placed .... AC>BC
 
Top