- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello.
I am currently in my PGY 5 (fellowship) year in anesthesia training and have been fortunate enough to field a few job offers in my desired geographic location. To be honest, I wasn't anticipating having multiple choices given the current market where I'm looking. I'm definitely not complaining, but now I find myself in a position where I don't want to make the "wrong" decision in selecting my first job.
The two jobs I'm looking at shake out as follows:
Job #1: Perfect location for me (in city). Smaller group, pure incorporated private practice, very fair "pooled units" type of system. Pretty much partner from day 1. Limited clinical scope (no OB, trauma, hearts; sparse thoracic, vascular, peds). Healthier patient population, but not surgicenter healthy. The limited scope means hours and call tend to be pretty great (home call, occasional emergency but usually you sleep). This is a group that doesn't hire often (as in, every 10 years or so when someone retires).
Job #2: Little bit worse location (a bit outside of city). Bigger group. Academically affiliated place, so you work with residents but there's no research obligation and the pay is better than true academics. Salary plus call incentive. Again, immediate partnership. Broad clinical scope, essentially everything excepts hearts. Sicker patients, potentially more stressful cases. Frequent in-house call, more weekend work. Although the people at Job #1 seem great, I think the group overall may be a bit stronger at job #2.
Pay, vacation and benefits are similar. I enjoy working with residents, but it's not an absolute must.
My thoughts are as follows:
1. Part of me thinks it would be wise to take the more clinically challenging job (#1) in order to consolidate my skill set and really come into my own as an attending. That way I will be able to fit into any group from a clinical standpoint if things change in the future and I need to look for a new gig. I'm concerned that limiting my clinical scope fresh out of training will limit my options down the road.
2. On the other hand, job #2 seems like a great lifestyle choice with great people in a phenomenal location. As I mentioned above, it's not a place that hires often because you can work there until you're 70 if you want to. Compared to job #1 it seems much more sustainable over a long career in regards to avoiding burnout, and maintaining a high quality of life.
I am happy that I have this "problem", as I know not everyone has been able to get a job in their desired location. I was just hoping to hear some sage wisdom from those of you making a similar decision or those of you who have been out in practice and have a more veteran perspective to offer.
Thanks
I am currently in my PGY 5 (fellowship) year in anesthesia training and have been fortunate enough to field a few job offers in my desired geographic location. To be honest, I wasn't anticipating having multiple choices given the current market where I'm looking. I'm definitely not complaining, but now I find myself in a position where I don't want to make the "wrong" decision in selecting my first job.
The two jobs I'm looking at shake out as follows:
Job #1: Perfect location for me (in city). Smaller group, pure incorporated private practice, very fair "pooled units" type of system. Pretty much partner from day 1. Limited clinical scope (no OB, trauma, hearts; sparse thoracic, vascular, peds). Healthier patient population, but not surgicenter healthy. The limited scope means hours and call tend to be pretty great (home call, occasional emergency but usually you sleep). This is a group that doesn't hire often (as in, every 10 years or so when someone retires).
Job #2: Little bit worse location (a bit outside of city). Bigger group. Academically affiliated place, so you work with residents but there's no research obligation and the pay is better than true academics. Salary plus call incentive. Again, immediate partnership. Broad clinical scope, essentially everything excepts hearts. Sicker patients, potentially more stressful cases. Frequent in-house call, more weekend work. Although the people at Job #1 seem great, I think the group overall may be a bit stronger at job #2.
Pay, vacation and benefits are similar. I enjoy working with residents, but it's not an absolute must.
My thoughts are as follows:
1. Part of me thinks it would be wise to take the more clinically challenging job (#1) in order to consolidate my skill set and really come into my own as an attending. That way I will be able to fit into any group from a clinical standpoint if things change in the future and I need to look for a new gig. I'm concerned that limiting my clinical scope fresh out of training will limit my options down the road.
2. On the other hand, job #2 seems like a great lifestyle choice with great people in a phenomenal location. As I mentioned above, it's not a place that hires often because you can work there until you're 70 if you want to. Compared to job #1 it seems much more sustainable over a long career in regards to avoiding burnout, and maintaining a high quality of life.
I am happy that I have this "problem", as I know not everyone has been able to get a job in their desired location. I was just hoping to hear some sage wisdom from those of you making a similar decision or those of you who have been out in practice and have a more veteran perspective to offer.
Thanks