Help with putting Publication and presentations in AADSAS

[nicole2]

---

Members don't see this ad.

So, I have a publication and 3 presentations on the same abstract. The publication has been submitted last week and the two presentations were last year at national symposiums and another one in couple weeks at international symposium.
Should I still list all of them even thou they are all on the same abstract?
Also, for description of presentations, can I just write “ assisted in presenting at ~national symposium”? I did not present it my professor and phd student did oral presentation but my name is in the presentation as a co-author.

Thanks!

 

[Bingwen]

I am not sure, maybe someone else can help. If you did not present, I don't know if I would include that. That would be something that you can talk about under research experience.

Is the publication published or just submitted? Some people might not consider the paper until it is officially accepted because the paper could still be rejected. If you are going to put it I would make sure that you say something along the lines of "submitted for publication" in the description.

 

[nicole2]

I am not sure, maybe someone else can help. If you did not present, I don't know if I would include that. That would be something that you can talk about under research experience.

Is the publication published or just submitted? Some people might not consider the paper until it is officially accepted because the paper could still be rejected. If you are going to put it I would make sure that you say something along the lines of "submitted for publication" in the description.

I know it's confusing. I was going to list the presentations and just say that I assisted in presenting the research and if school asks me about it at the interview I can probably explain.
With publication, it has been submitted last week and my professor said it will take about three weeks to process it. I'm pretty sure it won't get rejected since my PI also did oral presentation on it and was presented at three symposiums. I'm planning to submit my application on June 5th and that's roughly the time when the publication will be proved. Should I still put (Submitted) at the end? would dental schools care if it has "already" been published? I mean I still have time until June 5th.

thanks!

 

[tiper15]

What you can do is actually probably update the school after it gets published with a link to the actual article. I'm not sure how it works pre-dec, but you should be able to update your files with the schools that youve applied to somehow - perhaps email?

 

[Bingwen]

As long as you presented it in some way I think it would be ok to include. Some schools just may ask you about the presentation and if you didn't actually present the material they may consider that dishonest.

I would still put submitted personally. Again, if they go to look for the paper and can't find it they may just assume that you are lying about the publication. I would include the title and what journal you submitted to. That will give the schools the ability to check once it is published. In research there is just never a guarantee with publications.

 

[nicole2]

As long as you presented it in some way I think it would be ok to include. Some schools just may ask you about the presentation and if you didn't actually present the material they may consider that dishonest.

I would still put submitted personally. Again, if they go to look for the paper and can't find it they may just assume that you are lying about the publication. I would include the title and what journal you submitted to. That will give the schools the ability to check once it is published. In research there is just never a guarantee with publications.

Yea. So, for presentation description, I'm going to say assisted, not presented, along with a citation for presentation.
For publication, I have the citation that my PI sent me with (Submitted) at the end, so I'll use that to be safe!
Do you know how much detail I should go into in describing publication? The finding from the research? or what I contribute?? I was originally going to write what I did in the research but wasn't sure if I should also include the results.
Thanks!

 

[Bingwen]

Yea. So, for presentation description, I'm going to say assisted, not presented, along with a citation for presentation.
For publication, I have the citation that my PI sent me with (Submitted) at the end, so I'll use that to be safe!
Do you know how much detail I should go into in describing publication? The finding from the research? or what I contribute?? I was originally going to write what I did in the research but wasn't sure if I should also include the results.
Thanks!

I would say that it completely depends on what you are including in the research section. I put what I did for the publications and the experience that I got from the actual writing portion in my publication post.

Under the research section I talked more about the project and got more into depth in what I experiments I did and what I learned.

 

[deleted782438]

@nicole2 @Bingwen

so glad i found this thread. in a similar situation now.
there are 4 papers im working on now and 1 has just been submitted (invited to X journal) and PI spoke with editor
the 3 other papers are not complete but the manuscripts are being written right now.

How do I list these?

What I was suggested to do was put each project as a "Honor" and at the end say the current state of the project/paper and whether it is "in preparation"

How far do I need to go with the description? My contribution to the paper itself or my contribution to the project?



Type - Honors(?)
Name - Publication(?)
Name of Presenting Organization - journal submitted to or place where I research was conducted?
Issued date - today's date as and state of paper as of now?
Description - my contribution to paper and project and where title of paper??

 

[Bingwen]

@nicole2 @Bingwen

so glad i found this thread. in a similar situation now.
there are 4 papers im working on now and 1 has just been submitted (invited to X journal) and PI spoke with editor
the 3 other papers are not complete but the manuscripts are being written right now.

How do I list these?

What I was suggested to do was put each project as a "Honor" and at the end say the current state of the project/paper and whether it is "in preparation"

How far do I need to go with the description? My contribution to the paper itself or my contribution to the project?



Type - Honors(?)
Name - Publication(?)
Name of Presenting Organization - journal submitted to or place where I research was conducted?
Issued date - today's date as and state of paper as of now?
Description - my contribution to paper and project and where title of paper??

I selected Honors, Publication, Journal, date the paper was published and description I put what I did in terms of the paper.

I included my research work under the research tab for experiences so I focused on the paper in the achievements section. In the experiences section, I included work where the publication was being written. I personally did not include projects that were being written or were submitted in achievements because you never know if the publication is going to be accepted and I did not want to have to talk about a paper in an interview that just never got published. I will put it into the achievements sections if it gets published.

I think though that as long as you include something like submitted, in progress, being written, etc... you will be ok.

 

[Lane138]

If you are going around presenting the SAME project to multiple conferences, it should be listed as one. Otherwise, it's disingenuous. Submitting, or accepted, or actually published counts as something different and much more impressive!