- Joined
- Aug 14, 2014
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Why is there such a big range? Didn't think it would get as high as $85
Why is there such a big range?
I would chime in....but as Confettiflyer hinted at, the answer really is obvious. I will say, in most areas of the country, retail pays (IMO-others don't consider $10,000-$15,000/year more considerable) considerably more than hospital, CA is an exception due to the Kaiser union and labor laws.
A theoretical advantage to hospital (I say theoretical because in 3 years I've only gotten a $3/hr raise, but this was the case in the past) is that there are usually larger raises, and pay is experience based. Vs retail where there are rarely pay discrepancies between fairly new pharmacists and more senior colleagues.
In the past it was not uncommon to have veterans making $10-15/hr more than new hires.
New Mexico might be an exception too. Our hospital/ambulatory pharmacists (especially pharmacist clinicians) can do a lot and have better pay in many cases than retail pharmacists.That and California inpatient pharmacy is, on the whole, more progressive and involved than many parts of the country. The only exception might be North Carolina.
New Mexico might be an exception too. Our hospital/ambulatory pharmacists (especially pharmacist clinicians) can do a lot and have better pay in many cases than retail pharmacists.
Not so much labor laws, but cost of living is the biggest driver. Many non-union hospitals pay more than Kaiser.
Pharmacist salary is straight up middle class when you're surrounded by techies funded by the VC spigot.
That and California inpatient pharmacy is, on the whole, more progressive and involved than many parts of the country. The only exception might be North Carolina. Even your rural/out of the way/critical access hospitals practice pharmacy like they're a tertiary/university affiliated medical center.
That's a blanket statement though, so take that with a grain of salt.
I don't see what cost of living would have to do with hospital pharmacists making more than retail pharmacists, when the opposite is true in most areas of the country (I'd expect cost of living tends would raise the salary for everyone, with the ratio remaining the same.)
But, yes CA pharmacists being very progressive, I can see that accounting for higher salaries in hospitals.
What I'll never understand is how hospital techs and interns are paid more than retail techs and interns but hospital pharmacists are NOT paid more than retail pharmacists.
1. Hospital techs are paid more because they have more responsibility - easier for them to mess up and a pharmacist not catching it. Think IV room. Also, there mistakes can cost a lot of money (think about messing up and sending some expensive inhaler multiple times to the floor, mixing and IV wrong, etc).
2. Hospital pharmacist make less because the job is more desirable than retail pharmacy. FYI- my hospital currently has an opening and had 60+ applicants, most of which were in retail, and thus had their resume not given a second look.
agreed -The funny thing about this is that...
1. Hospital technician jobs are more desirable. Higher pay, less stress from dealing with the public.
2. Hospital pharmacists have more responsibility - easier for them to make a mistake that can cost thousands or serious injury/death.
Yet the pay discrepancy remains.. except in California.
That's a huge pay hike $13/hr. So am not going to ask if it was worth it. But how do you like your job now? Is this hike adequately compensating itself?I went from $43 an hour to $56/hour when I switched 3 and a half years ago from hospital to retail.
I like the job significantly more. Its less stressful, my boss doesn't yell at me every day for every amoeba-sized mistake I make, I have regular hours so I can plan my life, the patients are generally not that bad once they've gotten to know me. I literally have zero complaints.That's a huge pay hike $13/hr. So am not going to ask if it was worth it. But how do you like your job now? Is this hike adequately compensating itself?
I went from $43 an hour to $56/hour when I switched 3 and a half years ago from hospital to retail.
Not really. Montgomery County and Morgantown are pretty comparable as far as housing prices go. Property taxes are way steeper, but that's like $2,000 a year.You forgot to mention you went from a super cheap location to something a little more pricey, so that accounts for some of the salary hike.
Not really. Montgomery County and Morgantown are pretty comparable as far as housing prices go. Property taxes are way steeper, but that's like $2,000 a year.
Not so much labor laws, but cost of living is the biggest driver. Many non-union hospitals pay more than Kaiser.
Pharmacist salary is straight up middle class when you're surrounded by techies funded by the VC spigot.
That and California inpatient pharmacy is, on the whole, more progressive and involved than many parts of the country. The only exception might be North Carolina. Even your rural/out of the way/critical access hospitals practice pharmacy like they're a tertiary/university affiliated medical center.
That's a blanket statement though, so take that with a grain of salt.
Morgantown vs. MontCo, comparable? I believe you but don't believe you at the same time.
I went from $43 an hour to $56/hour when I switched 3 and a half years ago from hospital to retail.
Can you expand on how hospital pharmacy is more progressive compared to most other areas of the country?
I see it mentioned frequently but I've never heard any details. Not doubting you just curious what CA laws allow hospital pharmacists to do that they wouldn't be able to do in other parts of the country.
Bump just as I'm still curious.....