D
deleted862527
Is this common? I am curious about this.
Like switch programs or switch specialties? Neither is common or ideal.
It is very rare. It requires doing a second residency, or a second fellowship in the case of switching from one sub-specialty to another within internal medicine (e.g. switching from gastroenterology to nephrology). Most people would not devote another 2-3 years to training unless they really felt it was a better fit than what they were already doing. I do recall someone who switched to psychiatry and did a psych residency.... it is quite unusual to make that leap.Switch specialties
It is not common, but it happens.How common is it for doctors' to change [specialty of] residencies?
Is this common? I am curious about this.
Is this common? I am curious about this.
So it depends on the field where you start with and we somewhat suffer from a lack of data - which is better for some fields than others. For the best example, roughly 18 percent (so almost 1 in 5) of general surgery categorical residents do not complete their general surgery residency. Of those residents, approximately 20% stay within general surgery, and 80% (so ~15% of the total) go to a different field with anesthesia being the most common.
For internal medicine, >90% (I think it was around 94%, but don't quote me on that) of residents finish their IM program. Pediatrics has a similar attrition rate. The remaining 5-10% presumably have a mix of people who try to find a different field or a different program in the same field.
The highest attrition rate that I'm aware of is Psychiatry, with >25% of residents not completing the program. I am not sure if that includes people who leave their general psych program early to "fast track" into child psych (and when I've looked it up in the past have been unable to answer that question).
You can see some of the raw numbers in the ACGME Data Book (PDF warning) but it isn't spelled out so clearly. Some of the relevant portion:
View attachment 250827
View attachment 250829
I don't know what exactly defines "withdrew" "dismissed" "transferred" or "unsuccessfully completed program" but all of those could potentially be people who tried a different field afterwards (or not). Subspecialty residents are typically fellows, so we won't count those. Probably shouldn't also count those residents who died - that brings up a full attrition rate of 1900 residents who didn't complete a program for whatever reason not including death, from a total population of 111,758 active specialty residents in the same year - that's an overall attrition rate of 1.7%/year. With the average length of a residency program somewhere around 4 years, the best overall estimate I could give is an attrition rate of ~7% for the overall population (which fits with what my gut says, so I'm going with it)
You can try to calculate specialty specific numbers using the table in the data book, but it's way more effort than I'm willing to expend.
Regardless of how you measure it though, the vast majority of people complete their initial residency program. Some proportion do quit (or get fired) and then attempt to do a different field, but that number is certainly <5%. In addition, some proportion of people who complete an initial primary residency do go back and do a second one - but that number is also very small. Most of the time people find another role within the same field - either through further training (i.e. a fellowship) or just a different job. Say, a primary care doctor can become a hospitalist. Or work for a nursing home. Or do insurance physicals. Or work for an insurance company reviewing claims. etc.
Wow! Thank you for such a thorough review.
I was curious. I once heard of a pathology resident switch to E.R. Do interviewers view switching residencies unfavorably? I honestly would suspect they would but I don't know.
It is very rare. It requires doing a second residency, or a second fellowship in the case of switching from one sub-specialty to another within internal medicine (e.g. switching from gastroenterology to nephrology). Most people would not devote another 2-3 years to training unless they really felt it was a better fit than what they were already doing. I do recall someone who switched to psychiatry and did a psych residency.... it is quite unusual to make that leap.
Generally not, but there are some exceptions. Neuro-onc is a neuro fellowship (although interestingly many older neuro attendings also trained in IM back in the day so there is a lot of overlap). I believe neuro-onc is also open to neurosurgeons. But peds surgery for example is obviously a subspecialty of surgery rather than peds.In terms of sub-specialty, do fellowships that overlap two specialties accept people from either route? For example, would a neuro-oncology fellowship accept both oncology fellows and neurology residents?
Generally not, but there are some exceptions. Neuro-onc is a neuro fellowship (although interestingly many older neuro attendings also trained in IM back in the day so there is a lot of overlap). I believe neuro-onc is also open to neurosurgeons. But peds surgery for example is obviously a subspecialty of surgery rather than peds.
Exceptions include sports medicine (PM&R, FM) and some female pelvic surgery programs (obgyn, urology), although some are uro-only because they include male reconstruction. There is also child neuro, which can be reached via peds or a specific child neuro residency.
Then there are some fields with completely separate training pathways that end up converging on similar areas in practice. Probably the most obvious is adult primary care, which is covered by IM, FM, and, to an extent, obgyn (insert EM joke here). More specialized examples include some spine cases (neurosurgery/ortho), certain specific surgeries (carotid endarterectomies by neurosurgery vs. vascular), and lots of endovascular procedures will overlap somewhere between IR, vascular, neurosurgery, and neuro, +/- interventional cardiology.
If you want to more know about specific specialties, just google the name of the subspecialty, click on some of the programs that come up, and see what the application requirements are.
A quick google search told me that a number of neuro-onc programs will consider heme/onc trainees "on a case-by-case basis." I have no idea how common this is. All the neuro-oncologists I have met or even heard of have been neurologists (or neurosurgeons, though most wouldn't call themselves such).So IM/Onc trainees can’t pursue a neuro-oncology fellowship?
Why would they want to anyway? A fully trained heme/onc doesn't need to do a superfellowship to treat neuro-onc problems - they already can. The only utility I can see in pursuing a neuro-oncology fellowship is if you are dedicated to neuro-oncology research and want to make triple sure you can fill that niche in an academic medical center.A quick google search told me that a number of neuro-onc programs will consider heme/onc trainees "on a case-by-case basis." I have no idea how common this is. All the neuro-oncologists I have met or even heard of have been neurologists (or neurosurgeons, though most wouldn't call themselves such).
Good question. I assume it's for the research aspect as well.Why would they want to anyway? A fully trained heme/onc doesn't need to do a superfellowship to treat neuro-onc problems - they already can. The only utility I can see in pursuing a neuro-oncology fellowship is if you are dedicated to neuro-oncology research and want to make triple sure you can fill that niche in an academic medical center.