Originally posted by MacGyver
...Thats why PAs with good experience (maybe 10+ years) eventually will allowed to have the same practice scope as some surgeons.
I think we are back to the narrow view again. You seem to really ignore the concept of SCOPE OF PRACTICE. Just as a CRNA does NOT have the breadth of SCOPE OF PRACTICE that a MDA/DOA has, so too, a PA does NOT have the same breadth of SCOPE OF PRACTICE that a surgeon has. They may have experience which gives them technical skills. However, medicine as a whole is broader then that and requires of its technical practitioners skills and abilities beyond the OR. Surgeons do NOT spend 4 years in medical school in the OR. Surgeons do not spend all 80-120 hours of their 5-7 years of residency in the OR. Oral board exams and written board exams in surgery rarely if ever require a candidate to tie a "single hand knot". You will be asked things about electrolytes and TPN and basic sciences. Much of our training in medicine is "experiential" but is also on a continually expanding foundation of clinical & "basic science" that we keep abreast of and must do so. The "experiential" learning is actually quite organized with intervening clinical & "basic science" training (lectures, research, reading, etc...) to tie it all together and this takes place over the numerous years of our training starting in under-grad and extending into and beyond residency. We are not just "shadowing" some doctors and picking up random points of knowledge if our residency is working the way it is supposed to be working. To try and limit this sort of topic...once again, to just the technical OR stuff you propogate a dangerous misperception. That being that somehow one can become a good "physician" in surgery or anesthesia or Ortho, etc simply by completing undergrad and then spending a few years with a surgeon. I agree with the following
Originally posted by droliver
...the cognative discipline of surgery is much more elusive then the technical side
I would go one step further and apply this accross the board to physicians in general.
As per the original questions:
Originally posted by OwlMyste
...My major in college will be PA,...And I was wondering...In what ways do PA's help the surgeons in the O.R.?...Because If I decide not to be a surgeon, I want to be a PA in the O.R. ...I find Surgery facinating, thats why...🙂
I think it is important for you to get answers to these questions. I think ultimately how much or how little a PA does is dependent on the individual surgeon and the contractual agreement achieved at the time of employment. Salary will depend on the contract too. You should not base any career decisions largely on what you expect your salary to be as this will change greatly depending on economy, demand, and individual responsibilities. I have noted your profile says:
OwlMyste Profile
...I am Graduating High School on May 23, 2003!!!...
Undergrad School & Degree Nursing...
I note this because clearly you are early in your career, whatever that may ultimately turn out to be. Now is definately the time to go to career counselors at your school, get information from your school's career planning office, and maybe shadow some Nurses, PAs, and physicians. There is a great deal of published material out there that deals with these questions and you will likely get more accurate data from those sources. I have no titles for you. Your career/guidance counselor however will.
Some in this forum have talked about PAs doing "grunt work". I dare say the very definition suggests that PAs are in some way present to do "grunt work". Remember, they are NOT junior surgeons/physicians they are Physician Assistants. I think ultimately this comes down to doing those tasks that the physician (Derm, opthy, ortho, IM, surgeon, CT surgeon,...) does not want to do and feels the PA is capable of doing.
...PAs usually do the grunt work during the operation that the surgeon may feel is beneath his/her level...I've seen others serve as a glorified scrub nurse...
Ultimately, a good PA will do just about any task that will enable greater effciency and organization for the surgeon or surgical group. Most PAs I know find harvesting vein from a leg to be a privilege because it is a form of vascular surgery and a privilege for a non-surgeon to be allowed to perform this task to completion under the supervision of the surgeon. The same goes for chest "cracking". I do not see this activity as "grunt work". These are actually critical surgical procedures. Honestly, if a PA wanted to be allowed to do anastamosis routinely then they should pursue the training to be a MD/DO and then complete surgical residency. Remember, we in the surgical field may get bored with vein harvests but a vein harvest I would argue is more complex and more difficult to do well then the day to day grind of resecting a lipoma in the thigh. Monotony exists at all levels of the surgical career. The surgeon will get bored with doing lap-choles, etc... However, everyone in every field needs to be aware of what the day to day fundamentals of their job will entail and if that would be enough for you?