- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 0
I rarely post but am curious if anyone has insight on how applicants with sub-standard GPAs but decent DAT scores do. My DAT scores were kind of all over the place though:
PAT: 17 (42.4 percentile) 😱
QR: 18 (86.6)
RC: 24 (98)
Bio: 18 (72.1) 🙁
GC: 20 (86)
OC: 25 (98.4)
TS: 20 (91.3)
AA: 21 (97.2)
Undergrad GPA: 3.08
Science GPA: 2.85 🙁
^does not contain my summer course grades. I got a B+ in Physics I, an A in the lab, an A- in Physics II, and a B in the lab. I am trying to see if there's a way to get this to schools before the academic update period.
Grad GPA: 3.46 (MPH)
Worked two years in clinical research while getting my MPH, currently working in a research fellowship.
PAT: I guess I could be the poster child for why you should invest in Crack the PAT. I relied solely on Kaplan, and was getting 20-21 on the practice tests, mostly because I kept getting 100% on the hole-punching and angle ranking sections. I'd heard they were tougher on the real exam, and fully intended to get Crack the PAT, but I was under a horrible time crunch between summer classes, full-time work, and studying for the sciences. I hope this doesn't immediately remove me from some schools' consideration.
QR: I never ran out of time on any of my 6 practice tests, but I was so completely stumped on some questions that I ended up have very little time for the last five. Math has never been my thing though, so I'll take this score and run.
RC: I'd like to attribute this to being a lifelong bookworm, but my passages were much easier than the Kaplan ones full of scientists' name, dates, specific experiments, and technical jargon. My topics were aging, gene therapy, and telomere shortening.
Bio: Ahhh! This hurts worse than my PAT score! I was a bio major in undergrad and I thought I studied pretty well for this, but 10 questions in, I had to talk myself off the ledge of a panic attack. The topics I studied really hard, like cellular respiration, organ systems, mitosis/meiosis, had only one or two questions each. The rest were so random.
GC: I took GC eight years ago, and did terribly. THANK GOD for both Chad and DAT Destroyer.
OC: Honestly, I am not sure how this happened. This was my worst subject on every Kaplan practice exam, and I never got higher than a 16. I chalk this up to Destroyer, Chad, and a lot of luck.
Schools I applied to:
VCU
Howard
UMD
Temple
NYU
Tufts
BU
UoP
My friend is trying to talk me into adding Columbia, but with my GPA I regard my current schools as enough reaches. I was thinking of adding Roseman and LECOM, any advice?
PAT: 17 (42.4 percentile) 😱
QR: 18 (86.6)
RC: 24 (98)
Bio: 18 (72.1) 🙁
GC: 20 (86)
OC: 25 (98.4)

TS: 20 (91.3)
AA: 21 (97.2)
Undergrad GPA: 3.08
Science GPA: 2.85 🙁
^does not contain my summer course grades. I got a B+ in Physics I, an A in the lab, an A- in Physics II, and a B in the lab. I am trying to see if there's a way to get this to schools before the academic update period.
Grad GPA: 3.46 (MPH)
Worked two years in clinical research while getting my MPH, currently working in a research fellowship.
PAT: I guess I could be the poster child for why you should invest in Crack the PAT. I relied solely on Kaplan, and was getting 20-21 on the practice tests, mostly because I kept getting 100% on the hole-punching and angle ranking sections. I'd heard they were tougher on the real exam, and fully intended to get Crack the PAT, but I was under a horrible time crunch between summer classes, full-time work, and studying for the sciences. I hope this doesn't immediately remove me from some schools' consideration.
QR: I never ran out of time on any of my 6 practice tests, but I was so completely stumped on some questions that I ended up have very little time for the last five. Math has never been my thing though, so I'll take this score and run.
RC: I'd like to attribute this to being a lifelong bookworm, but my passages were much easier than the Kaplan ones full of scientists' name, dates, specific experiments, and technical jargon. My topics were aging, gene therapy, and telomere shortening.
Bio: Ahhh! This hurts worse than my PAT score! I was a bio major in undergrad and I thought I studied pretty well for this, but 10 questions in, I had to talk myself off the ledge of a panic attack. The topics I studied really hard, like cellular respiration, organ systems, mitosis/meiosis, had only one or two questions each. The rest were so random.
GC: I took GC eight years ago, and did terribly. THANK GOD for both Chad and DAT Destroyer.
OC: Honestly, I am not sure how this happened. This was my worst subject on every Kaplan practice exam, and I never got higher than a 16. I chalk this up to Destroyer, Chad, and a lot of luck.
Schools I applied to:
VCU
Howard
UMD
Temple
NYU
Tufts
BU
UoP
My friend is trying to talk me into adding Columbia, but with my GPA I regard my current schools as enough reaches. I was thinking of adding Roseman and LECOM, any advice?