How much does basic/clinical research count when applying for residency??

[socrates89]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

1. I know that USMLE's, Medical School grades, AOA membership, and electives count but if you could give a hypothetical percentage how much would research and publications count and help you when applying for residency?

1. Which research is regarded better when applying for residency

• Basic Research or
• Clinical Research

1. Since Basic Research takes more time and is more-in depth does it look better on your CV when applying for residency?

1. So I'm near publishing in neuro-science brain mapping research and will attend med school eventually trying to get into a Neuro-surgery residency. How much of a difference does it make when I show them that I've done basic Research in Neuro-Science?

1. Do 3-4 publications in Basic Neurosicence research help in boosting a persons chance in getting a residency in his respected field?

1. Also if your an USIMG does it look better when you have done this type of research since many other IMG's don't have such research on their resumes? How much does it help?

 

[Blade28]

(1) No one's going to be able to give you exact percentages.

(2) Research of any kind is always a plus.

(3) All else being equal, of course applicants with significant research on their CV will fare better than those without.

(4) I still think you're worrying a little prematurely, since you're about to start a 6-year medical school soon, no?

 

[socrates89]

anyone else can give some sort of feed-back??

 

[herpmed]

I agree that the inclusion of research in any residency application will have an unpredictable utility. As you indicate that you are interested in neurosurgery, the most important criteria will be competitive USMLE scores and strong medical school performance/LORs. Once the selection committee examines your application further (this is accomplished through those competitive scores, etc noted above), the research experience could certainly be a factor that may contribute to your selection. This can be influenced by venue as well (a strong research-oriented academic center vs a less research driven university hospital).
I was a career PI in toxicology/organismal biology until I decided to attend medical school. As I decided to pursue family medicine, the selection committee expressed initial concerns about my candidacy DUE TO my career as a research scientist and my intentions to continue my research after residency (as I have). Their concerns were based on the incorrect notion that scientists have difficulty clearly communicating with people. Obviously, in any primary care specialty, communication skills are of paramount import.
In neurosurgery this is obviously far less of a concern (!).
Therefore, in my opinion, your exam scores, medical school performance and LORs are the primary criteria to attract attention to your application. Thereafter, your research and pubs could have significant impact on your success. I feel this is unfortunate as I feel each candidate should be considered as a multi-dimensional individual as opposed to numbers on a page, however, due to application number, limited selection time, etc this is not likely to ever occur.

 

[Pilot Doc]

anyone else can give some sort of feed-back??

www.nrmp.org

Look for the Charting Outcomes in the Match link

LOADS of data about the impact of research on matching. No multivariate analysis, unfortunately, but it's a start.