C
Chankovsky
in helping you get a competitive residency
doc05 said:med school rep is huge. don't let anyone tell you differently.
Havarti666 said:If you are anywhere in between than you should just work hard and forget about it.
agreedFantasy Sports said:Well you should forget about it regardless, but I just wanted to point out that med school rep has a huge regional factor, regardless of whether you go to Harvard or not.
So UAB might not guarantee you a Mass Gen residency, but it is definitely well-respected in the south. Michigan might not guarantee you a residency in california, but it is well-respected in the midwest. And so on.
Fantasy Sports said:So UAB might not guarantee you a Mass Gen residency, but it is definitely well-respected in the south. Michigan might not guarantee you a residency in california, but it is well-respected in the midwest. And so on.
Havarti666 said:Also, geographic proximity can be a double edged sword. Some programs might want to recruit from well outside their geographic regions because it demonstrates their ability to draw students from afar. Hence, MGH might prefer someone from Wash U or UCLA over someone from BU or Tufts. Again, who knows?
Fantasy Sports said:Geographic proximity is a pretty big factor I think, because it indicates you are willing to live in that area, which tells PDs that if they rank you highly, you have a good chance of coming. And there are a lot of regional ties between schools as well that boost that interaction.
Fantasy Sports said:I think MGH would be perfectly content to have 3/4 of its class come from the northeast (and though I dont have a set of their recent class lists, I would a good proportion of their students come from the NE)
kas23 said:There is only one fact that I learned from these posts: students going to private schools say that your school matters (usually justifying their heavy loan burden) and students who go to state schools say it doesn't matter.
Havarti666 said:As I was lying awake last night (still recovering from a month in the Pacific Time Zone), I came across the idea that one could actually make some quantitative measure of how much reputation affects one's competitiveness. The problem is that it would require multiple years worth of data that only ERAS, the SF Match, the NRMP and the programs themselves would possess.
Alas, since that will never happen, we should all just stick to cocktails and conjecture instead.
yaah said:It would be an interesting study, however the # of confounding variables I think is probably too great to control for. There are so many factors that impact residency choice. However the fact remains that going to a certain medical school is not going to get you anywhere without the requisite work and effort.
paroquet said:It's possible to do this using modern machine learning methods. It would be no problem at all, actually, if these organizations released their accumulated data to artificial intelligence experts.
You could input salient variables such as your scores and grades, maybe your ethnicity, etc., and the computer program would give you your approximate chances for getting into the program.
In fact, they use this approach (with analogous data) to build biomedical informatics systems. (E.g., if someone weighs X lbs and is Y feet tall and has red hair, what's the probability that she will miscarry her child?) It's already a solved problem.