My understanding was that cortisol was a pro-gluconeogenic hormone.
It normally increases lipolysis in adipose tissue, protein breakdown in muscle, and gluconeogenesis in the liver. The combined effect of these three things is to increase the blood [glucose].
Assuming a fixed caloric intake, I would assume that a decrease in cortisol levels would result in reduce protein breakdown in muscle, reduced lipolysis in the adipose tissue, and reduced blood glucose levels. So you would be relatively hypoglycemic. But, if you are consuming the same amount of calories you were before a cortisol deficiency developed, why would you still lose weight? Protein and adipose breakdown are inhibited so you wouldn't be able to lose lean body mass or fat mass? Am I missing something here?
It normally increases lipolysis in adipose tissue, protein breakdown in muscle, and gluconeogenesis in the liver. The combined effect of these three things is to increase the blood [glucose].
Assuming a fixed caloric intake, I would assume that a decrease in cortisol levels would result in reduce protein breakdown in muscle, reduced lipolysis in the adipose tissue, and reduced blood glucose levels. So you would be relatively hypoglycemic. But, if you are consuming the same amount of calories you were before a cortisol deficiency developed, why would you still lose weight? Protein and adipose breakdown are inhibited so you wouldn't be able to lose lean body mass or fat mass? Am I missing something here?